APPASAHEB BABURAO LONKAR,PUNE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, PUNE
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT Pune for AY 2011-12. The assessee subsequently filed a withdrawal petition stating that a related appeal had already been decided.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal due to a prior decision on a related matter.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH, PUNE
Before: SHRI S.S.GODARA, JM & SHRI DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE, AM
आदेश / ORDER
PER S. S. GODARA, JM :
This assessee’s appeal for A.Y. 2011-12 is directed against the CIT(A) - 3, Pune’s order dated 25/01/2017 in case No. PN/CIT(A) -3 /Wd 4(4),Pn/109/2016-17 involving proceeding u/s. 143(3) r.w.s.147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ; in short "the Act. Heard both the parties. Case file perused.
It emerges at the outset the assessee has filed its withdrawal petition dated 19.04.2022 containing the following averments.
“Before ITAT ‘A’ bench, Pune. In the matter of Shir Appasaheb Baburao Lonkar 56/2/2 Aryavart Society, Shivajinagar Pune 411005. Hearing fixed on 20-04-2022. Sir, It is requested to allow me to withdraw the appeal fixed for hearing on 19-04-2022. The appeal of the assessee No. ITAT 888/Pun/2018 has been decided vide order dt. 02-01-2019.
The copy of the order enclosed.”
The Revenue is fair enough in not objecting the forgoing withdrawal averments. Ordered accordingly.
This assessee’s appeal is dismissed as withdrawn in above terms. Order pronounced in the Open Court on this 25th day of April, 2022.
Sd/- Sd/- S (DR.DIPAK P.RIPOTE) (S.S. GODARA) लेखध सदस्य/ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER न्यधनयक सदस्य/JUDICIAL MEMBER पपणे / Pune; ददनधांक / Dated : 25th April, 2022. Ashwini आदेश की प्रनतनलनप अग्रेनषत / Copy of the Order forwarded to : अपऩलधथी / The Appellant. 1. प्रत्यथी / The Respondent. 2. 3. The CIT(A)-3, Pune. 4. The Pr.CIT-2,Pune. 5. नवभधगऩय प्रनतनननध, आयकर अपऩलऩय अनधकरण, “ए” बेंच, पपणे / DR, ITAT, “A” Bench, Pune. गधर्ा फ़धइल / Guard File. 6.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026