UTTAM FARSAN,AURANGABAD vs. PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX- 1, NASHIK
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw the appeal as no objection was raised by the Revenue. The appeal was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income-tax under section 263. The assessee subsequently filed a letter seeking withdrawal of the appeal. The Assessing Officer had accepted the returned income after the consequential order was passed.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee can withdraw an appeal filed against an order under section 263 of the Income-tax Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “B”, PUNE
Before: SHRI R.S. SYAL & SHRI S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI
आदेश / ORDER PER R.S. SYAL, VP : This appeal by the assessee arises out of the order dated 17-03-2021 passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income- tax, Nashik-1 u/s.263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 in relation to the assessment year 2016-17. 2. Before us, the ld. counsel for the assessee has filed a letter dated 23-05-2022 seeking withdrawal of the appeal. The relevant contents of such letter read as under :
“The above appeal is fixed for hearing on 24.5.2022 before B Bench. The appeal is against order u/s.263. The consequential order giving effect to order u/s.263 has been passed and the ld.
AO has accepted the returned income. I therefore request that the appeal may kindly be allowed to be withdrawn. The Assessment Order is attached.”
The ld. DR did not raise any objection to the withdrawal of the appeal filed by the assessee. As such, the assessee is permitted to withdraw the appeal.
In the result, the appeal is dismissed as ‘withdrawn’. Order pronounced in the Open Court on 24th May, 2022.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tankala Soumya vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Rayagada Circle, RayagadaOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Pooja, Town Hallroad, Cuttack vs. State Tax Officer, Cuttack-I West Circle,CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Chicvogue Fashions Lip, Ganjam vs. State Tax Officer Bhubaneswar- Ii CircleOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Priya, Townhall Road, Cuttack vs. Superintendent Cuttack- I Range, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026