VIPIN KUMAR BANSAL,ALWAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(1), ALWAR

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1001/JPR/2024Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur15 July 2025AY 2012-13Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)1 pages

In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The assessee requested to withdraw the appeal as the dispute was settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The Revenue's DR concurred with the assessee's submission. The Tribunal allowed the withdrawal of the appeal.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order for the assessment year 2012-13. The assessee, through their AR, filed an application to withdraw the appeal. The ground for withdrawal was that the assessee had filed a declaration under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024, and a refund was due.

What were the issues?

Whether the assessee can be permitted to withdraw the appeal in light of settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES,’’SMC” JAIPUR

Before: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, JM & SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No.1001/JPR/2024

Hearing: 10/07/2025

PER: RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the ld. CIT(A) dated 30-05-2024, National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [ hereinafter referred to as “(CIT(A)/NFAC” ] for the assessment year 2012-13 raising the grounds appeal as mentioned at Form 36. 2.1 None appeared on behalf of the assessee but the ld. AR of the assessee vide application dated 21-02-2025 prayed for withdrawal of the appeal on the ground as under:- ‘’….it is submitted that the assesee has filed a declaration under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 on dated 27-01-2025. Ld. Pr. CIT-1, Jaipur has also issued Form No 2 in this case on 03-02-2025. As per Form No.2, a sum of Rs.78,660/- is refundable to assessee. Copy of Form No. 2 is enclosed herewith. Therefore, it is humbly requested to kindly permit us to withdrawal the appeal.’’ On the other hand, the ld. DR concurred with the submissions of the ld. AR of the assessee by filing a letter dated 23-04-2025 with the copy of the letter dated 22-04-2024 issued by Shri Shanti Lal Meena, ITO, Ward 1(1), Alwar that the ld. PCIT-1, Jaipur has issued Form No. 2 on 03-02-2025 and assessee has filed Form No. 3 on 24-02-2025. However, Form No. 4 has not been issued till now. 2.3 After considering the submissions of both the parties and perusing the materials available on record, it is found that the assessee is himself interested in withdrawing the appeal by settling the dispute, under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2024. The Bench further feels that in case of any other reasons the dispute is not settled in Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2024, the assessee shall be at liberty to apply for restoration of the appeal in accordance with law. In this view of the matter, the Bench allows the withdrawal of the appeal filed by the assessee on above count.

3.0.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as having been withdrawn. Order pronounced in the Open Court on 15 -07-2025. ¼ Mk0 ,l- lhrky{eh ½ ¼ jkBksM deys'k t;UrHkkbZ ½ (DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI) (Rathod Kamlesh Jayantbhai) U;kf;d lnL;@Judicial Member ys[kk lnL;@Accountant Member Tk;iqj@Jaipur fnukad@Dated:- 15 /07/2025 *Mishra आदेश की प्रतिलिपि अग्रेf’ात@ब्वचल वf जीम वतकमत वितूंतकमक जवरू

1.

The Appellant- Shri Vipin Kumar Bansal, Alwar 2. izR;FkhZ@ The Respondent- The ITO, Ward 1(1), Alwar 3. vk;dj vk;qDr@ The ld CIT 4. विभागीय प्रतिनिधि] आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर@क्त्ए प्ज्Aज्ए Jंपचनत 5. xkMZ QkbZy@ Guard File (ITA No.1001/JPR/2024) vkns'kkuqlkj@ By order, सहायक पंजीकार@Aेेजज. त्महपेजतंत

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →