M/S NOVO NORDISK INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-5(1)(1), BANGALORE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 2816/BANG/2017Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore04 August 2020AY 2013-143 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal allowed the assessee to withdraw the appeal based on the provisions of Rule 10RA(4) of the Income Tax Rules, which mandates withdrawal of pending appeals for rollback years covered by an APA.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against the assessment order for AY 2013-14. The assessee later entered into an Advance Pricing Agreement (APA) with the CBDT, which included rollback provisions for prior years.

What were the issues?

Whether a pending appeal can be withdrawn to give effect to an Advance Pricing Agreement with rollback provisions.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 143(3),Section 144C

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B’’BENCH: BANGALORE

Before: SHRI B. R. BASKARAN & SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE

For Respondent: Shri Muzaffar Hussain, D.R
Hearing: 04.08.2020Pronounced: 04.08.2020

PER B.R. BASKARAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:

1.

The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the assessment order passed by the A.O. for assessment year 2013-14 u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 144C of the Income-tax Act,1961 ['the Act' for short] in pursuance of directions given by Ld. DRP.

2.

None appeared on behalf of the assessee. However, the authorized representative of assessee has forwarded a letter dated 03rd August, 2020 by e-mail to the Tribunal, wherein it is stated that the assessee has entered into bilateral as well as unilateral advance pricing agreement (APA) with Central Board of Direct Taxes

IT(TP)A No.2816/Bang/2017 Novo Nordisk India Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore

Page 2 of 3 on 26.6.2020 for international transactions undertaken with its Associated Enterprises in Denmark as well as other jurisdictions. It is further stated that the terms of APA are applicable to consecutive 5 years commencing from assessment year 2017-18 with rollback of 4 years in respect of international transactions entered with AEs. Accordingly, it is stated that the year under consideration being assessment year 2013-14 would fall within rollback years.

3.

The assessee has also referred to the provisions of rule 10RA of Income Tax Rules, which reads as under: “Rule 10RA (4) if any appeal filed by the applicant is pending before the Commissioner (Appeals), Appellate Tribunal or the High Court for a rollback year, on the issue which is subject matter of the rollback provision for that year, the said appeal to the extent of the subject covered under the agreement shall be withdrawn by the applicant before furnishing the modified return for the said year.”

4.

In view of the above said rules, the Ld A.R has submitted in the above said letter that the assessee seeks to withdraw the appeal, so that the APA agreement is given effective to assessment year 2013-14 also.

5.

We heard Ld. D.R. on this issue. In view of the submissions made by the Ld AR in its letter referred above, we allow the assessee to withdraw the appeal.

IT(TP)A No.2816/Bang/2017 Novo Nordisk India Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore

Page 3 of 3 6. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

Order pronounced in the open court on 04.08.2020.

More judgments on Section 144C

All 3,699 judgments and leading authorities on Section 144C →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →