M/S NOVO NORDISK INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-5(1)(1), BANGALORE
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessee to withdraw the appeal based on the provisions of Rule 10RA(4) of the Income Tax Rules, which mandates withdrawal of pending appeals for rollback years covered by an APA.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the assessment order for AY 2013-14. The assessee later entered into an Advance Pricing Agreement (APA) with the CBDT, which included rollback provisions for prior years.
What were the issues?
Whether a pending appeal can be withdrawn to give effect to an Advance Pricing Agreement with rollback provisions.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B’’BENCH: BANGALORE
Before: SHRI B. R. BASKARAN & SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE
PER B.R. BASKARAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the assessment order passed by the A.O. for assessment year 2013-14 u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 144C of the Income-tax Act,1961 ['the Act' for short] in pursuance of directions given by Ld. DRP.
None appeared on behalf of the assessee. However, the authorized representative of assessee has forwarded a letter dated 03rd August, 2020 by e-mail to the Tribunal, wherein it is stated that the assessee has entered into bilateral as well as unilateral advance pricing agreement (APA) with Central Board of Direct Taxes
IT(TP)A No.2816/Bang/2017 Novo Nordisk India Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore
Page 2 of 3 on 26.6.2020 for international transactions undertaken with its Associated Enterprises in Denmark as well as other jurisdictions. It is further stated that the terms of APA are applicable to consecutive 5 years commencing from assessment year 2017-18 with rollback of 4 years in respect of international transactions entered with AEs. Accordingly, it is stated that the year under consideration being assessment year 2013-14 would fall within rollback years.
The assessee has also referred to the provisions of rule 10RA of Income Tax Rules, which reads as under: “Rule 10RA (4) if any appeal filed by the applicant is pending before the Commissioner (Appeals), Appellate Tribunal or the High Court for a rollback year, on the issue which is subject matter of the rollback provision for that year, the said appeal to the extent of the subject covered under the agreement shall be withdrawn by the applicant before furnishing the modified return for the said year.”
In view of the above said rules, the Ld A.R has submitted in the above said letter that the assessee seeks to withdraw the appeal, so that the APA agreement is given effective to assessment year 2013-14 also.
We heard Ld. D.R. on this issue. In view of the submissions made by the Ld AR in its letter referred above, we allow the assessee to withdraw the appeal.
IT(TP)A No.2816/Bang/2017 Novo Nordisk India Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore
Page 3 of 3 6. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open court on 04.08.2020.
More judgments on Section 144C
- Mishoo Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 19/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 18/KOL/2026[2016-2017]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2016-2017
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 17/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 16/KOL/2026[2014-2015]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2014-2015
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 15/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Kamlasana Impex Private Limited vs. Director General Of GST Intelligence (Hq) Delhi) & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Ritu Gautam Proprietor Of Ms Heritage International vs. Additional Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax Appeals Ii Delhi & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Sutha vs. The State Tax Officer(Inspection-3)Madras · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- Anisha Busa vs. Sibar Institute Of Dental SciencesAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026