SHREYESHI AGARWAL,JAIPUR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE -1, JAIPUR
आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,”A-Bench” JAIPUR
Jh xxu xks;y] ys[kk lnL; ,oa Jh ujsUnz dqekj] U;kf;d lnL; ds le{k
BEFORE: SHRI GAGAN GOYAL, AM & SHRI NARINDER KUMAR, JM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 188/JPR/2024
fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Year : 2015-16
Shreyeshi Agarwal
B-1, New Lite Clony, Tonk Road,
Circle-1,
Jaipur.
LFkk;hys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.:BFRPA7376E vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksjls@Assessee by : Shri Puneet Parkeek, Adv. (through V.C.) jktLo dh vksjls@Revenue by: Mrs. Anita Rinesh, JCIT-Sr.-DR lquokbZ dh rkjh[k@Date of Hearing
: 28/07/2025
mn?kks"k.kk dh rkjh[k@Date of Pronouncement: 29/07/2025
vkns'k@ORDER
Per: NARINDER KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER .
Appellant-assessee is before this Appellate Tribunal, feeling aggrieved by the order dated 25.01.2023, passed by Learned CIT(A),
National Faceless Appeal Centre, u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961
(hereinafter referred to as “the Act”), whereby her appeal challenging assessment order dated 26.12.2017, relating to the assessment year 2015-
16, was dismissed.
2
Shreyeshi Agarwal, Jaipur.
Today, Ld. AR for the appellant-assessee has presented copies of Form 1 to 3, and submitted that the assessee-appellant, having already resorted to the provisions of Direct Taxes Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024, this appeal may be dismissed as having been withdrawn. 3. It may be mentioned here that alongwith the appeal, an application seeking condonation of delay in filing the appeal was filed. Same is also pending. Ld. DR for the department has no objection to said submission put forth on behalf of the assessee-appellant-applicant. 4. Since the assessee-appellant-applicant has already applied for settlement under Direct Taxes Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024, and today, copies of Forms 1 to 3 issued by the competent authority have also been presented, as prayed the application seeking condonation of delay as well as the accompanying appeal are hereby dismissed as having been withdrawn. 5. However, it is made clear that in case no settlement is arrived at between the parties, the applicant shall be at liberty to apply for revival of the file, by moving appropriate application, and that too, in accordance with law.
3
Shreyeshi Agarwal, Jaipur.
File be consigned to the record room after the needful is done by the office.
Note be given on the Index page that the applicant has applied to the competent authority for settlement under the abovesaid scheme.
Order pronounced in the open court on 29/07/2025. ¼xxu xks;y½
¼ujsUnz dqekj½
(GAGAN GOYAL)
(NARINDER KUMAR) ys[kk lnL; @Accountant Member U;kf;d lnL;@Judicial Member
Tk;iqj@Jaipur fnukad@Dated:- 29/07/2025
*Santosh
आदेश की प्रतिलिपि अग्रेf’ात@ब्वचल वf जीम वतकमत वितूंतकमक जवरू
1. The Appellant- Shreyeshi Agarwal, Jaipur.
2. izR;FkhZ@ The Respondent- ACIT, Circle-1, Jaipur.
3. vk;dj vk;qDr@ The ld CIT
4. विभागीय प्रतिनिधि] आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर@क्त्ए प्ज्Aज्ए Jंपचनत
5. xkMZ QkbZy@ Guard File ITA No.188/JPR/2024) vkns'kkuqlkj@ By order,
सहायक पंजीकार@Aेेजज. त्महपेजतंत