SUNIL CHOUDHARY,JAIPUR vs. ITO, WARD 6(5), JAIPUR, JAIPUR
आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,”A-Bench” JAIPUR
Jh xxu xks;y] ys[kk lnL; ,oa Jh ujsUnz dqekj] U;kf;d lnL; ds le{k
BEFORE: SHRI GAGAN GOYAL, AM & SHRI NARINDER KUMAR, JM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 1366/JPR/2024
fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Year : 2014-15
Sunil Choudhary
C-74, Amba Bari,
Jaipur-302023. cuke
V.
The ITO,
Ward-6(5),
Jaipur.
LFkk;hys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.:AJIPC9619E vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksjls@Assessee by : Shri Mukesh Khandelwal, C.A.
jktLo dh vksjls@Revenue by: Shri Rajesh Ojha, CIT-DR lquokbZ dh rkjh[k@Date of Hearing
: 28/07/2025
mn?kks"k.kk dh rkjh[k@Date of Pronouncement: 29/07/2025
vkns'k@ORDER
Per: NARINDER KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER .
Appellant-assessee is before this Appellate Tribunal, feeling aggrieved by the order dated 12.11.2024, passed Learned CIT(A), National Faceless Appeal
Centre, u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”), as thereby his appeal, challenging assessment order dated 26.12.2016, relating to the assessment year 2014-15, was partly allowed, as regard ground No. 3, but dismissed, as regards ground Nos. 1 and 2, which related to long term capital gains.
2
Sunil Choudhary, Jaipur.
Today, Ld. AR for the appellant-assessee has presented copy of Form 4 and submitted that the assessee-appellant, having already taken steps for settlement under the provisions of Direct Taxes Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024, this appeal may be dismissed as having been withdrawn. 3. Ld. DR for the department has no objection to said submission put forth on behalf of the assessee-appellant. 4. Since the assessee-appellant has already taken steps and applied for settlement under Direct Taxes Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024, and today, copy of Form 4, issued by the competent authority, has also been presented, as prayed, this appeal is hereby dismissed as having been withdrawn. 5. However, it is made clear that in case no settlement is arrived at between the parties, the appellant shall be at liberty to apply for revival of the appeal by moving appropriate application, and that too only in accordance with law. File be consigned to the record room after the needful is done by the office.
Order pronounced in the open court on 29/07/2025. ¼xxu xks;y½
¼ujsUnz dqekj½
(GAGAN GOYAL)
(NARINDER KUMAR) ys[kk lnL; @Accountant Member U;kf;d lnL;@Judicial Member
Tk;iqj@Jaipur fnukad@Dated:- 29/07/2025
*Santosh
आदेश की प्रतिलिपि अग्रेf’ात@ब्वचल वf जीम वतकमत वितूंतकमक जवरू
3
Sunil Choudhary, Jaipur.
The Appellant- Sunil Choudhary, Jaipur. 2. izR;FkhZ@ The Respondent- ITO, Ward-6(5), Jaipur. 3. vk;dj vk;qDr@ The ld CIT 4. विभागीय प्रतिनिधि] आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर@क्त्ए प्ज्Aज्ए Jंपचनत 5. xkMZ QkbZy@ Guard File ITA No.1366/JPR/2024) vkns'kkuqlkj@ By order,
सहायक पंजीकार@Aेेजज. त्महपेजतंत