RAJESH CONSTRUCTION (BOMBAY),MUMBAI vs. ACIT-12(3), MUMBAI

O R D E R PER S. RIFAUR RAHMAN (AM) This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of the Learned 1. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) – 28, Mumbai [hereinafter in short “Ld.CIT(A)”] dated 14.11.2017 for the A.Y.2006-07.

(A.Y: 2006-07) Rajesh Construction (Bombay) Ld. Counsel for the assessee through his letter dated 23.11.2020 2. stated that assessee has opted for Viwad se Vishwas Scheme and requested for withdrawal of appeal. Ld. DR has no objection.

We have heard submissions. Contents of the letter filed by the 3. counsel for the assessee are as under: - “The above captioned appeal is fixed for hearing before your honours today, and I have been engaged to appear in the said appeal. The appellant has filed for amnesty under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme. I have been instructed by the assessee to withdraw the appeal. In view of the above the matter may be decided accordingly.”

In view of the above submissions and request for withdrawal of appeal, this appeal is permitted to be withdrawn.

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. 4.

Order pronounced on 23.11.2020 as per Rule 34(4) of ITAT Rules by placing the pronouncement list in the notice board.