DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 3, AURANGABAD vs. M/S. KASLIWAL NEST, AURANGABAD

PDF · subscribers
ITA 28/PUN/2019Status: DisposedITAT Pune19 July 2022AY 2013-143 pages

In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal as not pressed/maintainable due to low tax effect, as per CBDT Circular No. 17/2019. Consequently, the assessee's cross-objection was rendered infructuous and also dismissed.

What were the facts?

The Revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT, and the assessee filed a cross-objection. The tax effect in the Revenue's appeal was below the threshold stipulated by CBDT Circular No. 17/2019.

What were the issues?

Whether an appeal filed by the Revenue with a tax effect below the prescribed monetary limit should be dismissed. The maintainability of the assessee's cross-objection when the main appeal is dismissed on procedural grounds.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 268A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “A”, PUNE

Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO & SHRI S. S. VISWANETHRA RAVI

For Appellant: Shri S. N. Puranik
For Respondent: Shri Arvind Desai, Shri S. N. Puranik
Hearing: 19.07.2022Pronounced: 19.07.2022

Heard together (2 matters)

ITA No.28/PUN/2019
C.O. No.10/PUN/2022

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

ORDER

PER INTURI RAMA RAO, AM:

1.

This is an appeal filed by the Revenue directed against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)- 2, Aurangabad dated 17.10.2018 for the assessment year 2013-14. The assessee filed the Cross Objection in appeal of the Revenue.

C.O. No.10/PUN/2022 – By Revenue : 2. It is stated before us that the tax effect in the present appeal is less than Rs.50 lakhs and therefore, the Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) in exercise of its power vested under Sec.268A(1) of the IT Act comes into play wherein, the monetary limit for filing the appeal by the Revenue before the ITAT and various High Courts as well as Apex Court are revised with an object of reducing the tax litigation. Vide para 3 of the said circular (supra) it is stated that in cases where the tax effect in the appeals to be filed before the Appellate Tribunal does not exceed Rs.50 lakhs appeals should not be filed. Thus, taking a note of CBDT Circular No.17/2019, dated 08.08.2019 and considering the fact that the tax effect in the instant appeal is less than Rs.50 lakhs, the present appeal deserves to be dismissed as not pressed / not maintainable. However, we make it clear that the issues raised in the instant appeal are left open to be examined in the appropriate proceedings, if arises, in future. At the same time, we also make it clear that if the appeal falls in any of the exceptions referred to in the above said CBDT Circular, the Revenue is at liberty to move an application for recalling the order if so advised. Accordingly, in the light of CBDT Circular No.17/2019 dated 08/08/2019, the appeal filed by the Revenue stands dismissed.

More judgments on Section 268A

All 3,931 judgments and leading authorities on Section 268A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →