ASTEC LIFE SCIENCES LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT 2(1)(1), MUMBAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 6656/MUM/2018Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai01 December 2020AY 2013-143 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The tribunal, following a precedent from the Madras High Court, decided to dismiss the appeal. This dismissal is conditional on the assessee's intention to use the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals). The assessee informed the tribunal that they intend to file a declaration under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, to settle the dispute.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was whether the appeal should be dismissed in light of the assessee's intention to settle the dispute under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

N/A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH, MUMBAI

Before: SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY & SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL

For Appellant: Shri Akram Khan
For Respondent: Shri Brajendra Kumar

The captioned appeal has been filed by the assessee challenging the order dated 11th September 2018, passed by the learned Commissioner (Appeals)–4, Mumbai, pertaining to the assessment year 2013–14.

2.

Before us, the leaned Counsel for the assessee by way of letter dated 30th November 2020 submitted that the assessee is in the process of filing the declaration as required under The Direct Tax Vivad

2 Astec Lifesciences Ltd.

Se Vishwas Act, 2020, in respect of the dispute arising in the present appeal.

3.

We have heard the rival submissions and perused the material on record. The Hon’ble Madras High Court in order dated 16.10.2020 in case of M/s. Nannusamy Mohan (HUF) v/s ACIT, TCA no.372/2020, has disposed off the appeal filed by the assessee with a direction to file application under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. Further, the Hon’ble Madras High Court has observed that in the event the declaration filed by the assessee under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme is not in favour of the assessee, it will be open to the assessee to seek restoration of the appeal and on such prayer of the assessee, the Registry will not insist upon filing any application for condonation of delay. In view of the aforesaid decision of the Hon’ble Madras High Court, we are inclined to dismiss the present appeal keeping in view the fact that the assessee intends to settle the dispute raised in the present appeal under Vivad Se Vishwas Act,2020. However, we make it clear, in the event of non–acceptance of assessee’s declaration under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, the assessee would be at liberty to file a miscellaneous application seeking recall of this order. It is further made clear, the Registry should not insist upon filing any application seeking condonation of delay if there is any delay in filing the miscellaneous application.

3 Astec Lifesciences Ltd.

4.

In the result, appeal is dismissed with aforementioned liberty. Order pronounced in the open court on 01.12.2020.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →