DCIT, FARIDABAD vs. M/S. THE PALWAL CO-OP. SUGAR MILLS LTD., PALWAL
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that in view of CBDT Circular No. 17/2019, which enhanced the monetary limit for filing appeals to Rs. 50 lakhs, and the clarification that it applies to pending appeals, the Revenue's appeal was not maintainable.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT against an order of the CIT(A). The assessee pointed out that the tax effect on the disputed issue was below Rs. 50 lakhs. The Revenue's counsel did not dispute this fact.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the maintainability of the Revenue's appeal before the ITAT based on the monetary limit prescribed by the CBDT circular.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Not Applicable
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “G” NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA & SHRI B.R.R. KUMAR
O R D E R PER AMIT SHUKLA, JM
The aforesaid appeal has been filed by the Revenue against the impugned order dated 02.08.2016 passed by Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Faridabad for the Assessment Year 2013-14.
At the outset, it has been pointed out by the ld. counsel for the assessee that the tax effect on the disputed issue raised in the Revenue’s Appeal is much below Rs.50 lac, and therefore, in view of new CBDT Circular No.17/2019, the appeal of the Revenue is not maintainable. Ld. DR did not dispute that tax effect on the disputed issue is less than Rs.50 lac.
In view of the CBDT Circular No.17/2019 dated 8th August, 2019, wherein the CBDT has further enhanced the monetary limit for filing of appeal by the Department before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal from Rs.20 lacs to Rs.50 lacs. The said circular also make reference to the earlier Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11.07.2018 and specially states that as a step towards further management of litigation, the Board has decided to enhance the monetary limit for filing of the appeals. This circular is not in supersession of the earlier circular but only amends the monetary limits as well as gives clarification with regard to paragraph 5 of the earlier circular. This inter alia means that all the other conditions mentioned in the earlier Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11.07.2018 will apply mutatis mutandis including that is, it will apply to all the pending appeals.
Further CBDT vide clarification dated 20.08.2019 has clarified that the aforesaid circular will apply to all pending appeals. Accordingly, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed as non maintainable as the tax effect is below Rs.50 lakhs.
In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed. Order pronounced in the open Court on 6th December, 2019.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Commissioner/Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. M/S INDIA Agro Exports Private LimitedKarnataka · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026