RAM TULSIDAS JAGWANI,CBD BELAPUR vs. ADDLLE. CIT-TDS RANGE, THANE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal decided to dismiss the appeals, following a High Court decision regarding the VSVS scheme. The assessee was granted liberty to recall the appeals if they did not succeed under the VSVS scheme.
What were the facts?
The assessee preferred appeals against the confirmation of penalty imposed by the AO. The assessee intended to opt for the Vishwas Se Vivad Scheme (VSVS) 2020.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was how to deal with the pending appeals when the assessee opted for the Vishwas Se Vivad Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “D”, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI RAJESH KUMAR & SHRI AMARJIT SINGH
Per Rajesh Kumar, Accountant Member:
2 & ITA No.1771/M/2019 Ram Tulsidas Jagwani The above titled appeals have been preferred by the assessee against the order dated 17.01.2019 of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [hereinafter referred to as the CIT(A)] relevant to assessment years 2009-10 & 2010-11.
Both these appeals have been preferred by the assessee against the confirmation of penalty as imposed by the AO under section 272A(2)(k)/274 read with section 200(3) of the Act.
At the outset, the Counsel of the assessee submitted that the assessee is going in for Vishwas Se Vivad Scheme (VSVS) 2020 and therefore leave this discretion to the Bench as to how to deal with these appeals.
Since the assessee is going in for VSVS 2020 we are inclined to dismiss the appeals of the assessee in view of the decision of Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of Nannu Samy Mohan (HUF) vs. ACIT TCA No.372 of 2020 with the liberty to assessee to get these appeals recalled in case assessee does not succeed in VSVS 2020. Accordingly, both these appeals are dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 14.12.2020.
More judgments on Section 272A(2)(k)
- Maliwal Bherulal Jagnnath HUF, Jamnagar vs Income Tax Officer Ward 1(3), JamnagarITA 855/RJT/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- Colours Multimedia Private Limited, Delhi vs ITO, Ward 6(1), DelhiITA 6670/DEL/2025[2009-10]Status: Disposed5 Jun 2026AY 2009-10
- Kaushalya Infrastructure Development… vs I.T.O., Ward - 2(1), KolkataITA 180/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed13 Apr 2026AY 2015-2016
- Kaushalya Infrastructure Development… vs I.T.O., Ward - 2(1), TDS, KolkataITA 179/KOL/2026[2014-2015]Status: Disposed13 Apr 2026AY 2014-2015
- Kaushalya Infrastructure Development… vs I.T.O., Ward - 2(1), TDS, KolkataITA 178/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed13 Apr 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vajram Infra Material Industries vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Tyre Center vs. The Superintendent Of CGSTAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Sutlej Textiles And Industries Limited vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026