THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-6(1)(2), BANGALORE vs. M/S SOBHA SPACE PVT LTD, BANGALORE
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal because the tax effect was below the monetary limit prescribed by the CBDT circular for filing appeals. The revenue was granted liberty to seek recall if the issue falls under exceptions in the circular.
What were the facts?
The revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s order which held the reopening of assessment as invalid and deleted the addition of long-term capital gain. The tax effect of the disputed quantum was less than Rs. 50 lakhs.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the validity of the reopening of assessment and the deletion of the addition on merits. A secondary issue was the revenue's eligibility to pursue the appeal based on the tax effect.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A’’BENCH: BANGALORE
Before: SHRI B. R. BASKARAN & SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE
PER B.R. BASKARAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
The revenue has filed this appeal challenging the order dated 13.12.2018 passed by Ld. CIT(A)-6, Bengaluru and it relates to assessment year 2007-08. The revenue is challenging the decision rendered by Ld. CIT(A) on the validity of reopening of assessment and also in deleting the addition on merits.
The impugned assessment was reopened by the A.O. u/s 147 of the Income-tax Act,1961 ['the Act' for short], wherein the assessing officer assessed a sum of M/s. Sobha Space Pvt. Ltd., Bengaluru Page 2 of 3 Rs.1,31,65,575/- as long term capital gain. In the appeal filed before Ld. CIT(A), the first appellate authority held that the reopening of assessment is without jurisdiction and hence entire proceeding is void-ab-initio. On merits also, the Ld. CIT(A) held that the addition of Rs.1,31,65,575/- by way of long term capital gain is not sustainable. Aggrieved by the order passed by the Ld. CIT(A), the revenue has filed this appeal before us.
At the time of hearing, the Ld. A.R. submitted that the tax effect involved in the quantum disputed by the revenue is less than Rs.50 lakhs and hence in view of the circular no.17/2019 dated 8.8.2019, the revenue is precluded from pursuing this appeal.
We heard Ld. D.R. who did not dispute the factual aspects presented by Ld. A.R. Since the tax effect on the quantum in dispute is less than the monetary limit of Rs.50 lakhs prescribed by the CBDT in the circular referred above for preferring appeal before Tribunal by the revenue, the present appeal is liable to be dismissed in However, the revenue is given liberty to move appropriate application in accordance with law for recall of this order, if it is later found that the issue contested in the appeal is covered by any of the exceptions given in the circular.
M/s. Sobha Space Pvt. Ltd., Bengaluru Page 3 of 3
In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed. Order pronounced in the open court on 14-08-2020.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Saraswati Enterprises vs. State Of RajasthanRajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- Akshaya Consortium vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026