No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “SMC”, PUNE
Before: SHRI S. S. GODARA
ORDER
PER S. S. GODARA, JM:
This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2012-13 arises against the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi’s order dated 13.11.2021 passed in case no.ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2021- 22/1036906752(1) involving proceedings u/s 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961; in short “the Act”. Heard both the parties. Case files perused.
Delay of 10 days in filing of the instant appeal stands condoned since falling in Covid-19 Pandemic outbreak period.
It transpires during the course of hearing that the assessee challenges both the learned lower authorities’ action herein assessing at the rate of 9% qua gross turnover receipts of Rs.97,08,770/- thereby invoking section 44AD of the Act after taking recourse to section 147 r.w.s. 144 mechanism.
Learned counsel’s sole substantive plea in light of the assessee’s second ground is that both the lower authorities have wrongly adopted the assessee’s turnover period resulting in double addition. Mr. Jasnani has strongly supported the same. Face with this situation, I am of the opinion that the instant issue requires more a factual verification than any substantive adjudication. I therefore restore the same back to the Assessing Officer to ensure that there should not be any double addition of assessee’s turnover receipts; as the case may be. Ordered accordingly. No other ground or argument has been pressed during the course of hearing. 5. This assessee’s appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes in above terms. Order pronounced on this 26th day of July, 2022. Sd/- (S. S. GODARA) JUDICIAL MEMBER पुणे / Pune; �दनांक / Dated : 26th July, 2022. Sujeet (DOC)