MANIBHADRA BIO ENERGY,PUNE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 5 (4), PUNE
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the processing of bagasse for fuel briquettes is eligible for deduction under section 80JJA. The disallowance made by the lower authorities was found to be without merit.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed a deduction under section 80JJA for profits derived from processing bagasse into fuel. The lower authorities denied this claim, stating that bagasse is not considered waste.
What were the issues?
Whether bagasse processed into fuel briquettes qualifies as bio-degradable waste for the purpose of section 80JJA deduction.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Smt Padma S. Bora21 citing355 ITR 368 · 2015 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “SMC”, PUNE
Before: SHRI S. S. GODARA
ORDER
PER S. S. GODARA, JM:
This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2009-10 arises against the CIT(A)-4, Pune’s order dated 04.06.2019 passed in case no.PN/CIT(A)-4/ITO, Ward-5(4), Pune/282/2011-12 involving proceedings u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961; in short “the Act”. Case called twice. None appears at assessee’s behest. It is accordingly proceeded ex-parte.
The assessee’s sole substantive grievance raises in the instant appeal challenges correctness of both the lower authorities’ action 80JJA deduction claim of Rs.15,06,710/- thereby including that the corresponding “bagasse” is not a waste at all so as to be eligible for the same. Mr. Jasnani drew strong support therefrom in the course of hearing. 3. I have given my thoughtful consideration to the foregoing rival stands and find no merit in the Revenue’s argument. There could be hardly in dispute that the impugned section 80JJA deduction is allowable in respect of profits and gains derived from business of collecting and processing of bio-degradable waste. Hon’ble jurisdictional high court’s landmark decision in CIT vs. Padma S. Bora (2013) 355 ITR 368 (Bombay) holds in case of similar manufacturing of fuel briquettes from bagasse as admissible for section 80JJA deduction. I conclude in this factual and legal backdrop that the impugned disallowance deserves to be deleted. Ordered accordingly. 4. This assessee’s appeal is allowed in above terms. Order pronounced on this 26th day of July, 2022. Sd/- (S. S. GODARA) JUDICIAL MEMBER पुणे / Pune; �दनांक / Dated : 26th July, 2022. Sujeet (DOC)
More judgments on Section 80JJA
- Expert Global Solutions Private Limited… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 1…ITA 2557/PUN/2025[2022-2023]Status: Disposed10 Apr 2026AY 2022-2023
- Expert Global Solutions Private Limited… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 1…ITA 2556/PUN/2025[2021-2022]Status: Disposed10 Apr 2026AY 2021-2022
- Gardex India Private Limited, Jalandhar vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle-1…ITA 377/ASR/2025[2023-24]Status: Disposed21 Jan 2026AY 2023-24
- Arutla Charan Reddy, Hyderabad vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-15(1), HyderabadITA 1347/HYD/2025[2013-14]Status: Disposed21 Jan 2026AY 2013-14
- Klin Industries, Sandha Khamidana, Junagadh vs The ACIT, Circle, JunagadhITA 857/RJT/2025[2014-15]Status: Heard15 Jan 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026