M/S SOPLAR (INDIA) PVT LTD,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-6(1)(2), BANGALORE
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee sought withdrawal of the appeal due to opting for the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed appeals against a final assessment order. The assessee subsequently opted for the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020, and sought withdrawal of the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be withdrawn as the assessee opted for the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH : BANGALORE
Before: SHRI A.K GARODIA & SMT. BEENA PILLAI
ORDER PER BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER Present appeals have been filed by assessee against final assessment order dated 30/08/2017, passed by Ld.DCIT, Circle-6(1)(2) u/s 143(3) r.w.s 144C(13), Bangalore, for assessment years 2013-14. 2. A letter has been filed by Ld.AR stating that assessee has opted for Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. It has been submitted that assessee seeks withdrawal of the appeal. 3. Ld.Sr.DR do not object to the same.
Page 2 of 3 IT(TA)A No.1872/Bang/2017
We have perused submissions advances by both sides in light of records placed before us.
As assessee has sought for VSVS- scheme 2020, no purpose will be served in keeping the present appeal pending. We also note that assessee has yet not received Form 3 from the department. Considering the situation, we dismiss the present appeal as withdrawn. However, liberty is granted to move appropriate application for recall of this order, in the event, Form 1 filed by assessee is not accepted by revenue. In the result, with above liberty, we dismiss present appeal as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open court on 8th Sept, 2020. Sd/- Sd/- (A.K GARODIA) (BEENA PILLAI) Accountant Member Judicial Member Bangalore, Dated, the 8th Sept., 2020. /Vms/ Copy to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR, ITAT, Bangalore 6. Guard file
More judgments on Section 144C(13)
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 486/HYD/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 498/HYD/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2128/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 4558/MUM/2023[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026
- M/S Barnala Steel Industries Private Limited vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Skd Suppliers Private Limited vs. The Superintendent, Central CGST, Rishra Division, Range-Ii, And AnrCalcutta · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Aasha Industries vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Bharat Iron Scrap vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026