JITENDRA KUMAR FALOR,JAIPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3 , JAIPUR
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
During the hearing, the assessee's Authorized Representative requested to withdraw the appeal. The Department's Representative had no objection to this request.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) concerning a penalty of Rs. 4,90,000/- under Section 271AAB of the Act for the assessment year 2016-17.
What were the issues?
The assessee sought to withdraw its appeal against a penalty order.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES,”SMC JAIPUR
Before: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, JM & SHRI GAGAN GOYAL, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 1353/JP/2024
ORDER PER: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, J.M. The assessee has filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A), Jaipur -4 dated 18-09-2024 for the assessment year 2016-17 in the matter of penalty amounting to Rs. 4,90,000/- u/s 271AAB of the Act. During the course of hearing, the ld. AR of the assessee has prayed 2.1 for withdrawal of the appeal for which ld. DR has no objection. Hence, we allow to withdraw the appeal.
SHRI JITENDRA KUMAR FALOR VS ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, JAIPUR 3. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn as pronounced in the open Court on 18-08-2025.
Sd/- Sd/- ¼xxu Xkks;y ½ ¼ Mk0 ,l- lhrky{eh ½ (Gagan Goyal) (Dr. S. Seethalakshmi) ys[kk lnL;@Accountant Member U;kf;d lnL;@Judicial Member Tk;iqj@Jaipur fnukad@Dated:- 18/08/2025 *Mishra आदेश की प्रतिलिपि अग्रेf’ात@ब्वचल वf जीम वतकमत वितूंतकमक जवरू 1. The Appellant- Shri Jitendra Kumar Falor, Jaipur 2. izR;FkhZ@ The Respondent- The ACIT, Central Circle-3, Jaipur 3. vk;dj vk;qDr@ The ld CIT 4. विभागीय प्रतिनिधि] आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर@क्त्ए प्ज्Aज्ए Jंपचनत 5. xkMZ QkbZy@ Guard File (ITA Nos. 1353/JP/2024) vkns'kkuqlkj@ By order,
सहायक पंजीकार@Aेेज. त्महपेजतंत
More judgments on Section 271AAB
- M/S Amrit Cement Limited, Opposite Horse… vs DCIT, Central Cir 4(1), Kolkata, Aayakar…ITA 1564/KOL/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Amrit Cement Limited, Opposite Horse Shoe… vs DCIT, Central Cir 4(1), Kolkata, Aayakar…ITA 1559/KOL/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- M/S Amrit Cement Limited, Opposite Horse… vs DCIT, Central Cir 4(1), Kolkata, Aayakar…ITA 1558/KOL/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- M/S Amrit Cement Limited, Opposite Horse… vs DCIT, Central Cir 4(1), Kolkata, Aayakar…ITA 1557/KOL/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- M/S Amrit Cement Limited, Opposite Horse… vs DCIT, Central Cir 4(1), Kolkata, Aayakar…ITA 1556/KOL/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2012-13
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026