Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH: KOLKATA
Before: Shri J. Sudhakar Reddy, AM & Shri A. T. Varkey, JM]
ORDER
Per Shri A. T. Varkey, JM:
This appeal preferred by the assessee is against the order of Ld. CIT(A)-2, Kolkata dated 22.11.2019 for Assessment year 2014-15.
At the outset, we note that there is a letter from the karta of HUF (assessee) that they have already received Form number 3 from Ld. PCIT pursuant to their filing of Form nos. 1 and 2 as per the scheme envisaged in the Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Scheme, 2020 (hereinafter, the ‘scheme’). In the light of the aforesaid fact, we allow the assessee to withdraw the appeal.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order is pronounced in the open court on 21st January, 2021.
Sd/- Sd/- (J.S. Reddy) (A. T. Varkey) Accountant Member Judicial Member Dated: 21.01.2021 SB, Sr. PS 1 | P a g e
Aditya Chirimar & Sons (HUF) A.Y. 2014-15 Copy of the order forwarded to: 1. Appellant- Aditya Chirimar & Sons (HUF), 5B, 2nd Floor, Calcutta Stock Exchange, 7 Lyons Range, WB-700001
2. Respondent – ITO, Ward-6(1), Kolkata 3. The CIT(A)- 2, Kolkata (sent through e-mail) 4. CIT- , Kolkata 5. DR, Kolkata Benches, Kolkata (sent through e-mail)