BRINDAVAN COMMODITIES PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD - 7(4), KOLKATA, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the hearing notices were not served on the assessee. Therefore, the issue was restored to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication on merits.
What were the facts?
The assessee's share capital/premium of Rs. 15,45,15,000/- was added as unexplained cash credits. The CIT(A) passed an ex parte order without addressing the issue on merits.
What were the issues?
Whether the addition of share capital/premium as unexplained cash credits was justified and whether the CIT(A) order was passed without proper adjudication and service of notices.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA ‘C’ BENCH, KOLKATA
Before: Shri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Shri Satbeer Singh Godara
Per Shri Satbeer Singh Godara, Judicial Member:- The assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2009-10, arises against the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-16, Kolkata’s order dated 31.01.2017 passed in the case No. 620/CIT(A)-16/KOL/2015-16/W-7(4), involving proceedings under section 147/263/143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961; in short ‘the Act’. Heard both the parties. Case file perused.
Assessment Year: 2009-2010 Brindavan Commodities Pvt. Limited
The assessee’s first and foremost grievance seeks to reverse both the lower authorities action adding its share capital/prfemium of Rs.15,45,15,000/- as unexplained cash credits u/s 68 in the course of assessment and affirmed in the lower appellate proceedings. It is vehemently submitted that the Assessing Officer erred in making addition of Rs.15,45,15,000/- in the assessment in question framed on 31.03.2014 and that the CIT(A)’s order; passed ex parte, has also not dealt with the issue(s) on merits in the light of section 250(6) of the Act requiring framing of the points of determination followed by a detailed adjudication.
Ld. CIT(D.R.) at this stage invited our attention to para 4 at page 2 in the CIT(A)’s order that he had duly sent the corresponding notice(s) of hearing dated 24.08.2016, 10.05.2016 and 02.03.2016 to the assessee. The fact however remains that none of the said hearing notices has been served on the assessee as it is clear from the corresponding lower appellate observation(s). We, therefore, deem it appropriate in this factual backdrop to restore the issue back to the file of CIT(A) for fresh adjudication as per law on merits within three effective opportunities of hearing. The assessee shall itself appear before the CIT(A) on or before 31.08.2021 along with a copy of this order to prove the genuineness as well as creditworthiness of its investors concerned.
The assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes in above terms. Order pronounced in the open Court on January 22, 2021.
Sd/- Sd/-
(J. Sudhakar Reddy) (Satbeer Singh Godara) Accountant Member Judicial Member Kolkata, the 22 day of January, 2021 Assessment Year: 2009-2010 Brindavan Commodities Pvt. Limited Copies to : (1) Brindavan Commodities Pvt. Limited, C/o. RSVPC & Company, 41A, A.J.C. Bose Road, Suite No. 613, 6th Floor, Kolkata-700017
(2) Income Tax Officer, Ward-7(4), Kolkata, P-7, Chowringhee Square, Aayakar Bhavan, Kolkata-700069
(3) Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) -16, Kolkata; (4) Commissioner of Income Tax- , Kolkata (5) The Departmental Representative
More judgments on Section 68
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Bliss Dealtrade Private Limited, Kolkata vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 9(2) Kolkata…ITA 208/KOL/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-13
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Kamlasana Impex Private Limited vs. Director General Of GST Intelligence (Hq) Delhi) & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Ritu Gautam Proprietor Of Ms Heritage International vs. Additional Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax Appeals Ii Delhi & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Sutha vs. The State Tax Officer(Inspection-3)Madras · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- Anisha Busa vs. Sibar Institute Of Dental SciencesAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026