FOCUS ENERGY LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that in the absence of any exempt income earned by the assessee, the disallowance under Section 14A is not permissible, following the Supreme Court's decision in GVK Project and Technical Services Ltd.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeals were dismissed ex parte by the CIT(A) due to non-compliance. The assessee challenged the disallowance made under Section 14A of the Income-tax Act for three assessment years.
What were the issues?
Whether disallowance under Section 14A is permissible when no exempt income has been earned by the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Cheminvest Ltd. v. CIT1,569 citing61 Taxmann.com 118 · 2015 · HC · Read judgment
- PCIT v. GVK Project and Technical Services Ltd.68 citing106 Taxmann.com 181 · 2019 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘B’, NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA & SHRI O.P. KANT
Date of hearing 29.07.2019 Date of pronouncement 30.07.2019 ORDER PER O.P. KANT, A.M.: These appeals by the assessee are directed against three separate orders dated 14/12/2016 passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-27, New Delhi [in short ‘the Ld. CIT(A)’] for assessment year 2010-11, 2011-12 and 2012- 13 respectively. A common issue-in-dispute is involved in all the three appeals in same set of circumstances, and thus all these appeals were heard together and disposed off by way of this consolidated order for convenience.
In the grounds raised in all the three appeals, the disallowance under section 14A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’) is in dispute. The quantum of disallowance in the three assessment year is as under:
Briefly stated facts of the case are that in the case of the assessee’s search and seizure action under section 132 of the Act was carried out on 22/03/2012. Consequently assessments for assessment year 2010-11 and 2011-12 were completed under section 153A of the Act on 30/03/2015 and assessment for assessment year 2012-13 was completed under section 143(3) of the Act on 30/03/2015. The assessee challenged the assessment orders before the Ld. CIT(A). Due to non-compliance of the notices issued by the Ld. CIT(A), all the three appeals were dismissed ex parte. Aggrieved, assessee filed appeal before the Tribunal and challenged the disallowance under section 14A of the Act.
Before us, the Ld. counsel of the assessee filed copy of return of income along with computation sheet for all the three assessment years and submitted that no exempted income was earned by the assessee in all the three assessment years and therefore, in view of the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. GVK Project and Technical Services Ltd. reported in (2019) 106 taxmann.com 181 (SC), the disallowance might be deleted. 5. The Ld. DR, on the other hand, supported the order of the lower authorities. 6. We have heard the rival submission and perused the material on record in the light of the decision of the Hon’ble 3 896 & 897/Del/2017 Supreme Court cited by the Ld. counsel of the assessee. On perusal of the assessment orders in all the three assessment years and the copy of return of income along with computation sheet filed, it is evident that no exempt income was earned by the assessee in all the three assessment years. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of GVK Project and Technical Services Ltd. (supra) has approved the decision of the Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of Cheminvest Ltd. Vs CIT (2015) 61 taxmann.com 118 (Delhi) wherein it is held that in absence of an exempt income, disallowance under section 14A of the Act is not permissible. In view of no exempted income in the case of the assessee for all the three assessment years, the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer and sustained by the Ld. CIT(A) is directed to be deleted. The respective grounds in all the three appeals raised accordingly allowed. 7. In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are allowed. Order is pronounced in the open court on 30TH July, 2019.
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Suppliers,Ganjam vs. Assistant Commissioner Of CT And GST, Ganjam-I Circle,GanjamOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of Hte Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Govindjee Dairy Milk Private Limited vs. Central Goods And Services TaxRajasthan · 27 Oct 2026