DELMOS AVIATION PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee failed to produce the required bills and vouchers for the expenses, even after multiple opportunities. Therefore, the CIT(A) was justified in sustaining the disallowance.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal concerns disallowance of expenses amounting to Rs. 3,85,520/- due to deficiencies in supporting bills and vouchers. The Assessing Officer and the CIT(A) both disallowed these expenses after the assessee failed to provide adequate documentation.
What were the issues?
Whether expenses are allowable when the assessee fails to produce valid bills and vouchers in support of such expenses.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘B’, NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA & SHRI O.P. KANT
Date of hearing 01.08.2019 Date of pronouncement 06.08.2019 ORDER PER O.P. KANT, A.M.:
This appeal by the assessee is directed against order dated 17/11/2016 passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-3, New Delhi [in short ‘the Ld. CIT(A)’] for assessment year 2013-14 raising following grounds:
1. That on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals)-3 has erred by sustaining the disallowance of expenses Rs.3,85,520/- u/s 37(1) on the grounds of minor deficiencies in vouchers.
2. That on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Learned Commissioner (Appeals)-3 has wrongly understood the facts and documents submitted by the appellant during the course of proceedings before him.
The appellant craves the leave to add, substitute, modify, delete or amend all or any ground of appeal either befor or at the time of hearing.
2. Briefly stated facts of the case are that the assessee company was engaged in providing services of air cargo booking, air ticketing, trading and investment in securities and immovable properties. The assessee filed return of income on 30/09/2013, declaring total income of Rs.6,37,31,820/-, which was revised subsequently to Rs.6,44,26,140/-. The case was selected for scrutiny and notice under section 143(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’) was issued and complied with. In assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer, on verification of the bills and vouchers for other expenses of Rs.16,56,813/- produced by the assessee, found that bills and voucher for expenses of Rs.4,94,781/- were either not bearing name of the issuer or without any date. The Assessing Officer has produced entire list of such bills and voucher along with the defects noticed in the assessment order. Thus, looking to the defects in bills and vouchers, he disallowed the amount of Rs.4,94,781/-. On further appeal, the Ld. CIT(A) further provided an opportunity to the assessee to produce relevant bills and vouchers exceeding Rs. 10,000/-. However, in respect of the following expenses, the assessee failed to produce vouchers before him: S. No. Particulars Amount Remarks Farm house expenses 37,400 (94300-15000-7700-340000- 1 200)vouchers/bill without date Details of cash account 48,000 (52018-2688-1330) without date 2 and without bill 3 Cash payment 10034 Bill without date and without name 4 Plumber work 16,000 Without date 5 Gayatri Trader Gurgaon 59,086 Without date & without name 1,55,000 By name of Demos Bill of My Sam 6 Enterprises 7 Car Painter 10,000 Without date Car painter A/c Voucher without date 8 10,000 Car painter a/c Voucher without date 9 10,000 Car painter a/c Voucher without date 10 10,000 Car painter a/c Voucher without date 11 10,000 Total 3,85,520/- 2.1 In view of inability of the assessee in producing the vouchers for expenses, the Ld. CIT(A) upheld the disallowance of Rs.3,85,520/-. 2.2 Aggrieved with the addition sustained of Rs.3,85,520/- the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal. 3. We may like to mention that the assessee was duly notified for hearing on 30/07/2019 and the Ld. counsel of the assessee appearing on the said date was directed to produce relevant vouchers, if any, in support of the grounds raised
and case was adjourned accordingly. Despite adjournment of the case at the request of the Ld. counsel and date convenient to him, neither anyone attended on behalf of the assessee in the hearing, nor filed in any written submission. In the circumstances, we are of the opinion that assessee is not interested in prosecuting the appeal and accordingly proceeded to hear the appeal ex party qua the assessee.
4. The Ld. DR relied on the order of the lower authorities.
5. We have heard the submission of the Ld. DR. We find that assessee has been provided opportunity to produce bills and vouchers in respect of the expenses both by the Assessing Officer as well as by the Ld. CIT(A). The assessee has failed to produce bills and vouchers for the expenses of Rs.3,85,520/-before the Ld. CIT(A) and unable to file any such copy of vouchers before the Tribunal even after filing of appeal in the year 2017. In our opinion, in view of the failure on the part of the assessee in producing the vouchers of the relevant expenses, the Ld. CIT(A) is justified in sustaining the disallowance. The ground of the appeal of the assessee is accordingly dismissed.
6. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed. Order is pronounced in the open court on 6th August, 2019.
More judgments on Section 37(1)
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Smit Navnitlal Soni, Ahmedabad, Gujarat vs ITO Ward-5(3)(1), Ahmedabad, GujaratITA 1434/AHD/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Shobha Sudamrao Tagad, Ahmednagar vs ITO WD-1, AhmednagarITA 311/PUN/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Digjam Limited, Jamnagar vs The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 349/RJT/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Rajesh Maru, Mhow vs ITO-5(1), IndoreITA 839/IND/2025[2023-2024]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2023-2024
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ayush Sureshchandra Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- Sureshchandra Moolchand Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of Central GST And Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- T C Global INDIA Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central GST, North DelhiDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Kamlasana Impex Private Limited vs. Director General Of GST Intelligence (Hq) Delhi) & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026