ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2, KOTA, KOTA vs. CHAMBAL FERTILIZERS AND CHEMICALS LTD, KOTA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s findings on interest disallowance and remitted the matter back to the Assessing Officer to determine the availability of interest-free funds. Regarding the valuation of shares and capital loss, the Tribunal also remanded the issue to the Assessing Officer for fresh determination.
What were the facts?
The assessee company made investments in its subsidiary companies. The Assessing Officer disallowed interest on borrowed funds used for these investments under Section 36(1)(iii). The CIT(A) initially remanded the matter, and later allowed the assessee's appeal, deleting the disallowance. The department appealed this deletion.
What were the issues?
Whether interest on borrowed funds used for investment in subsidiaries is disallowable. Whether extinguishment of rights in a subsidiary company constitutes a transfer and results in a capital loss.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(6)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- S.A. Builders Ltd. v. CIT1,484 citing288 ITR 1 · 2007 · SC · Read judgment
- South Indian Bank Ltd. v. CIT508 citing438 ITR 1 · 2021 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Reliance Industries Ltd.501 citing410 ITR 466 · 2019 · SC
- CIT v. Abhishek Industries Ltd.359 citing286 ITR 1 · 2006 · HC
- Kartikeya v. Sarabhai vs. CIT25 citing228 ITR 163 · 1997 · SC · Read judgment
- Orient Trading Co. Ltd. v. CIT14 citing224 ITR 371 · 1997 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES,”A-Bench” JAIPUR
Before: SHRI GAGAN GOYAL, AM & SHRI NARINDER KUMAR, JM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 1090, 1097 to 1099 & 1091/JPR/2024
Result
As a result, as regards the issue of allowance/disallowance of interest claimed u/s 36(1)(iii) of the Act in respect of the amounts said to have been invested in subsidiaries/group companies/associates, findings recorded by Learned CIT(A) are set aside, and the matter is remitted to Learned Assessing Officer for decision afresh so as to record finding as to amount(s) of interest free funds available with the assessee during the assessment years under consideration, after verification of all relevant documents relied on behalf of the assessee in this regard, and then adjudicate the issue involved in accordance with law.
As regards the valuation of the shares and loss, if any, in view of the findings recorded above, the same is required to be assessed, before any further finding could be recorded about actual or notional loss, and as such, the findings recorded by Learned CIT(A) are set aside in this regard, and the matter is remanded to the Ld. Assessing Officer for determination of the 1097 TO 1099 & 1091/JPR/2024 Chambal Fertilizers and Chemicals Ltd., Kota valuation of the shares as on the date of transfer thereof, after providing reasonable opportunity of being heard to the parties.
In view of the above discussion, the appeals filed by the department are partly allowed for statistical purposes.
As regards other issues, in view of the above findings recorded under each head, the appeals filed by the department are hereby dismissed.
Copy of the common order is also placed in the connected appeal file. File consignment to the record room after the needful is done by the office. Order pronounced in the open court on 27/08/2025.
More judgments on Section 36(1)(iii)
- Hcy Industrial Parks Private Limited, Mumbai vs Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department…ITA 1899/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Hcy Industrial Parks Private Limited, Mumbai vs Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department…ITA 1899/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Shah Brothers, West Singhbhum vs ACIT/DCIT, Cen Cir-1, RanchiITA 239/RAN/2026[2017-2018]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2017-2018
- Ami Industries, Surendranagar vs The ITO Ward 1, SurendranagarITA 148/RJT/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Ami Industries, Surendranagar vs The ITO Ward 1, SurendranagarITA 148/RJT/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tvl. Jeyarani Shopping Centre vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer -1/The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 14 Oct 2026
- Rohan Tanna vs. Directorate General Of Goods And Services Tax IntelligenceChhattisgarh · 14 Oct 2026
- Dipak Saikia vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Saraswati Phukan vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026