VINOD KUMAR GUPTA,JAIPUR vs. ITO WARD 1(2), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

PDF · subscribers
ITA 726/JPR/2025Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur28 August 2025AY 2021-22Bench: SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member), SHRI NARINDER KUMAR (Judicial Member)1 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal noted that the assessee claimed income was taxed twice. The assessee demonstrated that income from property and other sources was already offered, and reclassifying it under business income was incorrect. The Tribunal found merit in the assessee's argument.

What were the facts?

The assessee challenged an order by the CIT(A) which confirmed additions made by the AO. The additions arose from a rectification order under Section 154, where income from house property and other sources was reclassified under business income. The assessee argued this led to double taxation.

What were the issues?

Whether reclassifying income from house property and other sources under business income, leading to double taxation, is valid under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 154,Section 143(1),Section 143(3),Section 234A,Section 234B,Section 234C,Section 234D,Section 80TTA,Section 288A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES,”SMC” JAIPUR

Before: SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM & SHRI NARINDER KUMAR, JM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 726/JP/2025

For Appellant: Adv. jktLo dh vksj ls@
Hearing: 20/08/2025Pronounced: 28/08/2025

Order pronounced in the open court on 28/08/2025.

Sd/- Sd/- ¼jkBkSM+ deys'k t;UrHkkbZ ½ ¼ujsUnz dqekj½ (RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI) (NARINDER KUMAR) ys[kk lnL; @Accountant Member U;kf;d lnL;@Judicial Member Tk;iqj@Jaipur fnukad@Dated:- 28/08/2025 *Ganesh Kumar, Sr. PS आदेश की प्रतिलिपि अग्रेf’ात@ब्वचल वf जीम वतकमत वितूंतकमक जवरू Vinod Kumar Gupta vs. ITO 1. The Appellant- Vinod Kumar Gupta, Jaipur izR;FkhZ@ The Respondent- ITO, Ward 1(2), Jaipur 2. 3. vk;dj vk;qDr@ The ld CIT 4. vk;dj vk;qDr¼vihy½@The ld CIT(A) 5. विभागीय प्रतिनिधि] आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर@क्त्ए प्ज्Aज्ए Jंपचनत 6. xkMZ QkbZy@ Guard File (ITA No. 726/JP/2025) vkns'kkuqlkj@ By order,

सहायक पंजीकार@Aेेज. त्महपेजतंत

More judgments on Section 154

All 8,676 judgments and leading authorities on Section 154 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →