SHRI TAPAN KUMAR DAS,NADIA vs. D.C.I.T.(IT)-2(1), KOLKATA
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal granted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. This was based on the assessee's compliance with the requirements of the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and the issuance of a certificate by the Designated Authority.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order of the CIT(A). The assessee later filed an application to withdraw the appeal. This was due to the assessee opting to settle the dispute under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal can be withdrawn if the assessee has opted for settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA BENCH ‘(C
Before: SHRI P.M. JAGTAP, HON’BLE(KZ) & SHRI A.T. VARKEY, HON’BLE]
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL KOLKATA BENCH ‘(C)’, KOLKATA [BEFORE SHRI P.M. JAGTAP, HON’BLE VICE PRESIDENT (KZ) & SHRI A.T. VARKEY, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER] [THROUGH VIRTUAL COURT] Assessment Year: 2015-16 Shri Tapan Kumar Das........................................................................................................Appellant A-8/51, Kalyani, Nadia – 741 235. [PAN: AJMPD 3453 D] Vs DCIT, International Taxation, Circle – 2(1), Kolkata...................………………….Respondent Appearances by: None appearing on behalf of the Assessee. Smt. Ranu Biswas, ACIT, Sr. DR appearing on behalf of the Revenue. Date of concluding the hearing : February 12, 2021 Date of pronouncing the order : February 12, 2021 ORDER PER BENCH:
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-22, Kolkata dated 30.09.2019.
In this case, the ld. counsel for the assessee has moved an application dated 10.02.2021 seeking withdrawal of this appeal on the ground that he has decided to settle the dispute involved in the said appeal under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. The assessee has duly filed the declarations in Form No. 1 and Form No. 2 and the Designated Authority has issued the certificate in Form No. 3 as per Section 5(1) of the Scheme accepting the assessee’s declaration under the same Scheme.
Assessment Year: 20115-16 Shri Tapan Kumar Das 3. Keeping in view these facts and circumstances of the case including especially the fact that the assessee has duly complied with the necessary requirements under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020, the permission as sought by the assessee is granted and this appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 12th February, 2021.
More judgments on Section 5(1)
- Bajrang Singh Rajawat, Jaipur vs ITO Ward-7(2), JaipurITA 1120/JPR/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Jul 2026AY 2014-15
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1232/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2016-17
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1231/SRT/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2015-16
- Amit Satpathy, Mumbai vs ITO-42(2)(1), MumbaiITA 5930/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed27 Feb 2026AY 2017-18
- Amish Anantrai Modi, Mumbai vs Central Circel 2(1), MumbaiITA 6281/MUM/2025[2011-2012]Status: Disposed9 Dec 2025AY 2011-2012
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026