M/S BRADY COMPANY INDIA PVT LTD,BANGALORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1(1)(2), BANGALORE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 3128/BANG/2018Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore18 February 2020AY 2012-135 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal in limine due to the low tax effect, as per CBDT guidelines. Consequently, the assessee's appeal and cross-objection were dismissed as not pressed.

What were the facts?

The Revenue's appeal was filed against an order for assessment year 2012-13. The Revenue's counsel submitted that the tax effect involved was less than 50 lakhs, making it ineligible to pursue the appeal as per CBDT Circular No. 17/2019.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was whether the Revenue's appeal was maintainable given the monetary limits prescribed by the CBDT for appeals before the Tribunal.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C’’ BENCH : BANGALORE

Before: SHRI B.R BASKARAN & SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE

For Appellant: Shri Chavali Narayan C.A & Smt. Vidya, Advocate
For Respondent: Shri Praddep Kumar, CIT & Smt. R Premi, JCIT (DR)
Hearing: 05.02.2020Pronounced: 18.02.2020

The cross appeals filed by the parties and the cross-objection filed by the assessee are directed against the order passed by ld CIT(A)-1, Bengaluru, for asst. year 2012-13.

2.

At the time of hearing the ld DR submitted that the tax effect involved in the issues contested by the Revenue is less than 50 lakhs. Accordingly it was submitted that the Revenue is precluded from pursuing this appeal as per Circular No.17/2019 dated &3380 /Bang/2017 CO No.1/Bang/2019 Page 3 of 5 8/8/2019 issued by Central Board of Direct Taxes, which has been clarified by CBDT as applicable to all pending appeals, vide its Instruction dated 20/8/2019.

3.

Since it is stated that the appeal of revenue shall be hit by the monetary limits prescribed by the CBDT in its Circular, referred above, for preferring appeals before the Tribunal, we dismiss the appeal of the Revenue in limine. However liberty is given to the Revenue to move application for recall of the order, if it is found that the tax effect involved on the issues disputed in the appeal is more than 50 lakhs or if it is found that the issues contested therein fall in the category of exceptions prescribed by the CBDT Circular.

4.

The Ld A.R appearing for the assessee submitted that in the event that the Department appeal is dismissed on account of tax effect, the assessee shall withdraw its appeal and cross-objection. The assessee also moved a letter dated 5th Feb, 2020 in this regard.

5.

Since we have held that the Revenue appeal is not maintainable in view of the CBDT Circular referred above, we dismiss the appeal of the Revenue in limine. Accordingly the appeal and the Cross-objection filed by the assessee are dismissed as not pressed. &3380 /Bang/2017 CO No.1/Bang/2019 Page 4 of 5

6.

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed in limine and the appeal and Cross-objection of the assessee is dismissed as not pressed.

Order pronounced in the open court on 18th February, 2020.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →