NITU MUNDHRA,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O.,WARD-37(2), KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to restore it if issues arose with the Vivad Se Vishwas certificate.
What were the facts?
The assessee wished to settle the dispute under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. Declarations were filed, but the certificate from the Designated Authority was not yet issued.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee can withdraw the appeal to pursue settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH, KOLKATA
Before: SHRI P.M. JAGTAP
आदेश / ORDER
This appeal is preferred by the assessee against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-11, Kolkata, dated 31-07-2019 for assessment year 2014-15.
The assessee in this case has filed a letter informing that she has decided to settle the dispute involved in this appeal under the Direct Tax – Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. The assessee has also submitted that the declarations / in Form No.1 and Form No.2 have already been filed, but the Designated Authority has not issued certificate in Form No.3 as per section 5(1) of the said Scheme so far, determining the tax payable by the assessee under the said Scheme.
Keeping in view the facts stated above including especially the fact that the assessee has duly complied with all necessary requirements under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020, we permit the assessee to withdraw this appeal and dismiss the said appeal with a liberty to the assessee that in case there is any problem in issuance of certificate in Form No.3 by the Designated Authority or any such other situation making the assessee not eligible to opt for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020, it will have the liberty to approach this Tribunal with a request for restoration of this appeal.
In the result, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open court on 23rd March, 2021.
More judgments on Section 5(1)
- Bajrang Singh Rajawat, Jaipur vs ITO Ward-7(2), JaipurITA 1120/JPR/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Jul 2026AY 2014-15
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1232/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2016-17
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1231/SRT/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2015-16
- Amit Satpathy, Mumbai vs ITO-42(2)(1), MumbaiITA 5930/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed27 Feb 2026AY 2017-18
- Amish Anantrai Modi, Mumbai vs Central Circel 2(1), MumbaiITA 6281/MUM/2025[2011-2012]Status: Disposed9 Dec 2025AY 2011-2012
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026