SUBHASH ANANDRAM JAISINGHANI,PUNE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 8 (2), PUNE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had availed the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme and the Income Tax Department had issued Form 3. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal for AY 2014-15. During the hearing, the assessee's counsel moved a withdrawal application stating that the assessee had opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas (VSV) scheme and made the required payment.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal can be withdrawn by the assessee due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, PUNE
Before: SHRI S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JM & DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE, AM
आदेश/ ORDER PER: DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE, AM: This is an appeal filed by the Assessee directed against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-6, Pune, (in short, the CIT(A) in Appeal No. PN/CIT(A)-6/ITO Wd.8(2)/10087/2017-18 dated 22/01/2019 for the Assessment Year 2014-15.
During the course of hearing none appeared on behalf of the assessee but a withdrawal application has been moved by the Ld. Counsel for the assessee which reads as under:
Sir, With reference to your above cited Notice dated 24/12/2021 issued to my above named Client, fixing the date of hearing on 09/02/2022, I would like to submit as under: Please note that Appellant had applied for VSV Scheme in Form 1 and Form 2 on 09/12/2020 and the Honorable PCIT Thane-1 granted us Form 3 for payment and Appelant has made payment of Rs. 20,590/- on 31/12/2021 and submitted Form 4 alongwith Challan details Form 5 of VSV is awaited. Hence, your honor is requested to kindly withdraw the Appeal filed by us for AY 2014-15. Thanking you. Yours faithfully Sd/- Suresh N. Otwani Advocate.”
ITA 392/PUN/2019 for A.Y. 2014-15 Subhash Anandram Jaisinghani Vs ITO 3. In the present case, it is noticed that the assessee has availed the immunity scheme i.e; Vivad Se Vishwas and the Income Tax Department has since issued Form 3 bearing certificate no. 874358140231220, in response to the application filed by the assessee, under section 5(1) of the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020, therefore the appeal of the assessee is to be dismissed as withdrawn.
The Ld. DR did not object if appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of the above the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed.
(Order pronounced in the open court on 30/03/2022)
More judgments on Section 5(1)
- Bajrang Singh Rajawat, Jaipur vs ITO Ward-7(2), JaipurITA 1120/JPR/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Jul 2026AY 2014-15
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1232/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2016-17
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1231/SRT/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2015-16
- Amit Satpathy, Mumbai vs ITO-42(2)(1), MumbaiITA 5930/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed27 Feb 2026AY 2017-18
- Amish Anantrai Modi, Mumbai vs Central Circel 2(1), MumbaiITA 6281/MUM/2025[2011-2012]Status: Disposed9 Dec 2025AY 2011-2012
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Barnala Steel Industries Private Limited vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Skd Suppliers Private Limited vs. The Superintendent, Central CGST, Rishra Division, Range-Ii, And AnrCalcutta · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Aasha Industries vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Bharat Iron Scrap vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026