DCIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), NEW DELHI vs. M/S. STARWOOD HOTELS & RESORTS WORLDWIDE INC., NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal followed the coordinate bench's decision, which was based on the jurisdictional High Court's ruling in the assessee's own case. The High Court had held that such services do not constitute FTS.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s order which held that centralized services fees received by the assessee were not taxable as Fees for Technical Services (FTS). The fees were for services like sales, marketing, loyalty programs, and reservations provided to customers in India.
What were the issues?
Whether centralized services fees received by the assessee for various services rendered to Indian customers are taxable as Fees for Technical Services (FTS) under the Income Tax Act and the India-US DTAA.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES ‘G’, NEW DELHI
Before: Sh. Amit ShuklaDr. B. R. R. Kumar
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES ‘G’, NEW DELHI Before Sh. Amit Shukla, Judicial Member Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member Asstt. Year : 2012-13 DCIT(International Taxation), V M/s Starwood Hotels & Resorts Circle-3(1)(2), s Worldwide Inc., C/o M/s Nangia & New Delhi Co., Suite 4A, Plaza M 6, Jasola, New Delhi-110025 (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN No. AAOCS2525F Assessee by : Sh. Amit Arora & Vishal Mishra, CA Revenue by : Sh. N. K. Bansal, Sr. DR Date of Hearing: 28.08.2019 Date of Pronouncement: 02.09.2019 ORDER Per Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member:
The present appeal has been filed by the Revenue against the order of the ld. CIT(A)-43, New Delhi dated 26.07.2016.
Only one ground has been raised in this appeal: “(i) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the ld. CIT (A) has erred in holding that the Centralized services fee received by the appellant for rendering various services such as Sales and Marketing, Loyalty Programs, Reservation Service, Technological Service, Operational Services and Training, Program etc. to customers in India, were not taxable as “Fees for Technical Services” (FTS) in terms of Section 9 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as well as Article 12 of the India-US Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA).”
2 Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide Inc.
We find that the issue has been already adjudicated in the assessee’s own case for the assessment year 2011-12 by the Co-ordinate Bench of ITAT Delhi. The decision of the Co- ordinate Bench was based on the judgment of the Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court in assessee’s own case that the receipt on account of sales and marketing, loyalty programmes, reservation services, technological services and operational services do not constitute fee for technical services. Hence, respectfully following, the orders of the Co-ordinate Bench and Hon’ble High Court of Delhi, we decline to interfere in the order of the ld. CIT (A).
In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed. (Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 02/09/2019).
More judgments on Section 9
- Kohler Co., United States of America vs DCIT, International Taxation, Circle1(2)…ITA 185/BANG/2025[2020-2021]Status: Disposed27 Aug 2026AY 2020-2021
- ACIT, Delhi vs Gamma Pizzakraft Lanka (Private) Limited…ITITA 27/DEL/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed12 Aug 2026AY 2016-17
- ACIT, New Delhi vs Gamma Pizzakraft Lanka (Private) Limited…ITITA 26/DEL/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed12 Aug 2026AY 2016-17
- Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax (Int Tax)… vs Mercedes-Benz Group Ag, MumbaiITA 2879/MUM/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed30 Jul 2026AY 2020-21
- Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax (Int Tax)… vs Mercedes-Benz Group Ag, MumbaiITA 2878/MUM/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed30 Jul 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026
- M/S Barnala Steel Industries Private Limited vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Skd Suppliers Private Limited vs. The Superintendent, Central CGST, Rishra Division, Range-Ii, And AnrCalcutta · 22 Oct 2026