M/S. G.K. DAIRY & MILK PRODUCTS PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ADDL. CIT, NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the addition was not justified as the liabilities pertained to earlier years and were brought forward. Since the AO had not doubted these brought-forward creditors in prior years, there was no basis for making an addition in the current assessment year.
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officer (AO) made an addition of Rs. 5,09,155/- under Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act, treating outstanding sundry creditors for three consecutive years as income. The assessee contended that these creditors were still payable and intended to make payments.
What were the issues?
Whether outstanding sundry creditors, brought forward from previous years and still payable, can be treated as income under Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES “C”: DELHI
Before: SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI & SHRI O.P. KANT
This appeal by Assessee has been directed against the Order of the Ld. CIT(A)-XV, New Delhi, Dated 31.03.2014 for the A.Y. 2009-2010.
We have considered the rival submissions and perused the material on record.
2 ITA.No.3064/Del./2014 M/s. G.K. Dairy & Milk Products Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi.
Learned Counsel for the Assessee did not pres Ground Nos. 1 and 2 of the appeal of assessee. The same are accordingly dismissed as not pressed.
On Ground No.3, assessee challenged the addition of Rs.5,09,155/- under section 41(1) of the I.T. Act.
The A.O. noted that during the course of assessment proceedings it was seen that following sundry creditors are outstanding for the last three consecutive years : i. New Modest Engineers Rs.1,04,500/- ii. Graphics ads P. Ltd., Rs.3,16,761/- iii. JMD Projects P. Ltd., Rs. 87,894 ------------------ Rs.5,09,155/-
------------------- 4.1. The assessee contended before the A.O. that these creditors are still payable. The amount payable to them has accrued to them in the course of running of business and the company plans to make payment to these creditors on the basis of demand raised by them. The A.O. however, did not accept the contention of assessee and made the addition. The Ld. CIT(A) confirmed the addition.
3 ITA.No.3064/Del./2014 M/s. G.K. Dairy & Milk Products Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi.
After considering the rival submissions, we are of the view that the addition is not justified. The liability exist in the books of account are pertain to the earlier years. The sundry creditors are brought forward from the earlier years which have not been doubted by the A.O. Therefore, there is no question of making addition in the assessment year under appeal. In view of the above, we set aside the Orders of the authorities below and delete the addition.
In the result, appeal of Assessee partly allowed.
Order pronounced in the open Court.
More judgments on Section 41(1)
- ACIT, Central Circle, Agra vs M/S Ghanaram Infraengineers Pvt. Ltd., New…ITA 328/AGR/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- ACIT, Central Circle, Agra vs M/S Ghanaram Infraengineers Pvt. Ltd., New…ITA 327/AGR/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- ACIT, Central Circle, Agra vs M/S Ghanaram Infraengineers Pvt. Ltd., New…ITA 326/AGR/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- ACIT-Central Circle, Agra vs M/S Ghanaram Infraengineers Pvt. Ltd., New…ITA 325/AGR/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Morlidhar B Vamdote, Bardoli vs ITO, Ward-1, BardoliITA 1174/SRT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Barnala Steel Industries Private Limited vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Skd Suppliers Private Limited vs. The Superintendent, Central CGST, Rishra Division, Range-Ii, And AnrCalcutta · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Aasha Industries vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Bharat Iron Scrap vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026