EVERSTRONG MARKETING PRIVATE LIMITED,BHILWARA vs. I.T.O.,WARD-9(2), KOLKATA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 44/KOL/2020Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata11 May 2021AY 2014-152 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found a violation of natural justice as the assessee was not aware of the hearing date. The order of the CIT(A) was set aside, and the appeal was restored to the CIT(A)'s file.

What were the facts?

The assessee sought an adjournment before the CIT(A) and expected the hearing on a later date. However, the CIT(A) passed an ex-parte order without proper notice of the hearing date.

What were the issues?

Whether the ex-parte order passed by the CIT(A) violated the principles of natural justice due to lack of proper notice.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 250(6)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH: KOLKATA

Pronounced: 11.05.2021

ORDER

Per Shri A.T.Varkey, JM

1.

This appeal preferred by the assessee is against the order of Ld. CIT(A)-15, Kolkata dated 19.02.2019 for A Y 2014-15.

2.

At the outset, the Ld. AR Shri A. K. Tibrewal, FCA drew our attention to ground no. 2 of the appeal and submitted that when the appeal was fixed on 22.01.2019 before the Ld CIT(A), the assessee had sought adjournment and at that time, the Ld. CIT(A) had adjourned the case for hearing to 22.12.2019. However, to the astonishment of the assessee, the Ld. CIT(A) has passed the impugned ex-parte order on 19.02.2019, without giving notice of hearing or informing about the change in listing of case. Therefore, according to the Ld. AR, the assessee was not aware that the matter was fixed for hearing on 19.02.2019, since it expected the appeal to be heard on 22.12.2019, therefore, there was per-se violation of Natural Justice and he prayed that the matter may be restored back to the file of the Ld. CIT(A). The Ld. DR does not have any objection if the matter is restored back to the Ld. CIT(A). We note that there is no dispute about the aforesaid facts. Therefore, we are inclined to set aside the order of the Ld. CIT(A) and restore the appeal back to the file of the Ld. Everstrong Marketing Pvt. Ltd., AY 2014-15 CIT(A) to decide the appeal by passing a reasoned order as envisaged u/s. 250(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 3. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order is pronounced in the open court on 11th May, 2021.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →