SMT. S. LALITHA,CHENNAI vs. ITO, NCW-7(3), CHENNAI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal. Since the assessee opted for the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme, the appeal was permitted to be withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT with a delay of 132 days due to COVID-19. The assessee subsequently opted for the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme 2020 and was issued Form No. 3.
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in filing the appeal should be condoned and if the appeal can be withdrawn due to opting for the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: SHRI DUVVURU R.L. REDDY & SHRI G. MANJUNATHA
घोषणा क� तारीख /Date of : 01-02-2021 Pronouncement आदेश / O R D E R PER DUVVURU R.L.REDDY, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This appeal filed by the assessee is against the order of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-7, Chennai, in dated 13.01.2020 relevant to the Assessment Year 2015-16.
When the appeal was taken up for hearing, the ld. Counsel for the assessee has submitted that the assessee was suffering from COVID-19 and after recovery from the viral infection, she could not get the medical certificate, thereby there was a delay of 132 days in filing the appeal before the Tribunal. It was prayed that the above delay in filing the appeal may kindly be condoned, against which, the ld. DR has not seriously objected to the above submissions of the ld. Counsel. Since the assessee was prevented by sufficient cause, the delay of 132 days in filing the appeal stands condoned and the appeal is taken up for adjudication.
The learned Counsel for the Assessee has further submitted that the Assessee has opted to avail the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme 2020 and Form No.3 was also issued. He has submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the appeal.
On the other hand the learned Departmental Representative has not raised any objection to the submissions of the learned Counsel for the Assessee.
We have heard both the sides, perused the materials available on record and gone through the orders of the authorities below.
3 :: 6. In this case, the Assessee has opted for the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme 2020 and the Designated Authority has issued Form No.3 for the settlement of pending tax dispute. Accordingly, he prayed that he may be permitted to withdraw the appeal.
In view of the submissions of the Assessee, the appeal filed by the Assessee is permitted to be withdrawn. However, it is open to the Assessee to approach the Tribunal by filing an appropriate application in the event of any injustice caused to the Assessee in respect of the settlement of dispute relating to the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme 2020.
In the result, the appeal of the Assessee in is dismissed as withdrawn.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Its Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr The Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026