M/S. SRI MADANANTHA NIRANTARA PRASADA VINIYOGA SAMITHI TRUST,SHIMOGA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), BANGALORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found the assessee's explanation for non-compliance (manager's medical emergency abroad) to be realistic and supported by evidence. Therefore, the CIT's order was set aside.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a charitable trust, applied for registration under Section 12AA. The CIT (Exemptions) rejected the application for non-compliance after the assessee failed to provide requested details by the due date.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT (Exemptions) was justified in rejecting the registration application solely on the grounds of non-compliance without considering the reasons provided by the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BANGALORE BENCHES “ B ” BENCH: BANGALORE
Before: SHRI B.R. BASKARAN & SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALESmt. Soumya. K. Advocate. Shri Muzaffar Hussain,. CIT (D.R)
O R D E R
PER SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE, JM :
The assessee has filed an appeal against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Bangalore rejecting the Registration sought under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act).
The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal :
The Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a charitable trust. The assessee has made an application for Registration under Section 12AA on 3 3.2.2019. The CIT (Exemptions) has issued letter dt.29.07.2019 calling for certain details and clarifications to be submitted by the assessee trust by 08.08.2019. Whereas The CIT (Exemptions) in the absence of details called for from the assessee, he could not ascertain the genuineness of the trust and its activities and observed that the assessee is not serious in prosecuting the case and rejected the application for registration u/sec12AA of the act for non-compliance on 21.08.2019. Aggrieved by the order of CIT (Exemptions), the assessee has filed an appeal with the Tribunal.
At the time of hearing, the learned Authorized Representative submitted that the assessee is a genuine trust and its objects and activities are charitable in nature. In compliance to the letter of CIT (Exemptions) dt.29.07.2019, the assessee has sent a request letter by Speed Post to CIT(E) for some time for production of documents, as the Manager of the trust was out of country on medical emergency. And the assessee is serious in prosecuting the application for registration u/sec12AA of the act and prayed for providing one more opportunity to represent the case with evidences and details before the CIT (Exemptions) and allow the appeal. Contra, the learned Departmental Representative supported the order of the CIT (Exemptions).
We heard the rival submissions and perused the material on record. Prima facie, the CIT (Exemptions) has rejected the registration under Section 12AA of the Act observing that the assessee has not responded to the office letter dt.29.07.2019 with submissions on or before 8.8.2019. Because of non-compliance by the assessee,the CIT (Appeals) could not ascertain the genuineness of the trust and its activities and hence rejected the application for non-compliance. The learned Authorized Representative supported her arguments relying on the Paper Book page no 1, the letter dt.2.8.2019 sent through Speed Post to the CIT (Exemptions) requesting to extend the time for production of details ,as the Manager of the Trust was out of country and also supported with the Passport Copy of the Manager . We found the submissions of the LdAr are realistic with supporting evidences, and also the Trust is serious in prosecuting the application for registration under Section 12AA of the Act. Considering the facts and circumstances,we set aside the order of CIT (Exemptions) and restore the disputed issue to the file of the CIT (Exemptions) with the direction to consider afresh and pass a speaking order. The assessee should be provided adequate opportunity of hearing and shall co-operate in submitting the information and details for early disposal of the application for registration under Section 12AA of the Act. Accordingly, we allow the appeal of the assessee for statistical purposes.
More judgments on Section 12AA
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Sri Jawahar Education Trust, Chamarajanagar vs The Income Tax Officer Ward 1…ITA 1735/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026
- Ayush Sureshchandra Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- Sureshchandra Moolchand Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026