M/S. KAVITHA PAI PANEMANGALORE,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD- 1(2)(4), BANGALORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and would withdraw the appeal in due course. Since no purpose would be served by keeping the appeal pending, the Tribunal dismissed it as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order confirming the rejection of set off of long-term capital loss and disallowance under Section 14A. The assessee sought an adjournment to await the outcome of their application under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BANGALORE BENCHES : “A”, BANGALORE
Before: SHRI N.V.VASUDEVAN & SHRI B.R.BASKARAN
PER B.R.BASKARAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER :
The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the order dated 25-01- 2019 passed by Ld CIT(A)-2, Bengaluru and it relates to the assessment year 2013-14. The grounds of appeal urged by the assessee show that she is aggrieved by the decision of Ld CIT(A) in confirming rejection of claim of set off of long term capital loss against house property income and also confirming the disallowance made u/s 14A of the Act, 1961.
2. None appeared on behalf of the assessee. However, the assessee has sent an email to the registry on 09th day of June, 2020 seeking adjournment and the same reads as under:- “With reference to the above appeal, hearing has been fixed on 15-06-2020 We would like to inform you that appellant has sought to apply for VIVAD SE VISWAS Scheme and has applied form1 & 2 (E Filed Receipt No.3485 22160080620).The outcome/acceptance of the application is pending with the Department. Under these circumstances, the appellant would like to withdraw the appeal as the original form 1 & 2 have been filed on 08-06-2020. Else the appeal would be continued on rejection of the application by the Department. Kindly adjourn the same for the future withdrawal of continuation of the appeal. We request your good self to place this adjournment letter before Hon’ble Member to re-fix the hearing during the month of July, 2020”
The Ld D.R, however, submitted that the assessee has to withdraw the pending appeals after filing Form VSV1 as per Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020. Thereafter, the assessee is required to furnish a copy of the same along with the proof of payment of tax as determined by the tax official to the department. He submitted that the Form no.3 shall be issued to the assessee in due course and accordingly he submitted that this appeals of the assessee may be dismissed as withdrawn, as the assessee, in any way, is required to withdraw the appeal.
We heard Ld D.R and perused the record. Since the assessee has opted for Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020, the appellant would be moving application for withdrawing the present appeal filed before the Tribunal in due course. Since the assessee has already filed the necessary applications before the tax authorities under the above 3 said scheme, we are of the view that no purpose will be served in keeping these appeals pending. Accordingly we dismiss this appeal of the assessee as withdrawn. 5. We notice that the assessee has sought adjournment till the time Form no.3 is received from the department, meaning thereby, the assessee wants to make sure that the tax liability mentioned by him in Form no.1 should get confirmed by the revenue. Under these set of facts, since we have dismissed the appeal, the assessee is given liberty to move appropriate application for recall of the present order in accordance with the law, if the assessee intends to do so. 6. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Pronounced in the open Court on 15-06-2020 (N.V.VASUDEVAN) (B.R.BASKARAN) VICE PRESIDENT ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Place: Bangalore Dated: *am Copy of the Order forwarded to: 1.Appellant; 2.Respondent; 3.CIT; 4.CIT(A); 5.DR 6.Guard File
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S New Sana Brick Field vs. Union Of INDIA And 4 OthersAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Vinay Singh vs. Union Of INDIAAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Aaradhyam Infrabuilders PVT LTD vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026