PRABHA PAL,BAREILLY vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD (2)1, BAREILLY, BAREILLY
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SMC BENCH, LUCKNOW
Before: SHRI. SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVAAssessment Year: 2014-15
This appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order dated 21.08.2024, passed by the Ld. Addl/JCIT(A)-9,
Mumbai for Assessment Year 2014-15. 2. None was present for the assessee when the appeal was called out for hearing. However, an application for withdrawal of appeal was placed before me.
3. During the course of hearing, it was brought to my notice that there is a delay of 49 days in filing the appeal before the Tribunal. Since the delay in filing the appeal was very nominal, the ld. D.R. had no objection to the delay being condoned. In view of the no objection by the ld. D.R., I condone the delay in filing of the appeal and admit the appeal for hearing.
ITA No.731/LKW/2024 Page 2 of 3
At the outset, my attention was invited to the application dated 18.01.2025, vide which it has been submitted that the assessee has opted for Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 (DTVSV, 2024) and copy of Form No.2 dated 10.01.2025 issued by the Ld. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Bareilly (designated authority) has been enclosed. The prayer of the assessee was that in view of the above, she may be permitted to withdraw the appeal. 5. In view of the prayer made by the assessee, I permit the assessee to withdraw the appeal and the same is consigned to the records with the liberty to the assessee to approach the Tribunal again in case the assessee’s application under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 is not finally accepted by the Department. 6. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open Court on 23/01/2025. [SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA]
JUDICIAL MEMBER
DATED:23/01/2025
JJ:
ITA No.731/LKW/2024 Page 3 of 3