MR. SATYA DEV SINGH,BAHRAICH vs. ITO RANGE-2, BAHRAICH
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SMC BENCH, LUCKNOW
Before: SHRI. SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVAAssessment Year: 2014-15
This appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order dated 02.01.2024, passed by the Ld. Addl/JCIT(A)-1,
Delhi for Assessment Year 2014-15. 2. At the outset, the Ld. Authorized Representative for the assessee (Ld. A.R.) invited my attention to the application dated
10.12.2024, vide which it has been submitted that the assessee has opted for Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024
(DTVSV, 2024) and copy of Form No.1 filed before the Income Tax
Department, vide acknowledgement No.724914890251124 dated
25.11.2024 has also been enclosed. It has been stated that in response to Form No.1, the Ld. Principal Commissioner of Income
ITA No.257/LKW/2024 Page 2 of 2
Tax, Gorakhpur (designated authority) has issued Form No.2 on 05.12.2024. It has been further submitted that the assessee has also deposited the tax due in Form III on 09.12.2024 and a copy of the Challan has also been enclosed. The prayer of the assessee was that in view of the above, he may be permitted to withdraw the appeal.
3. In view of the prayer made by the assessee, I permit the assessee to withdraw the appeal and the same is consigned to the records with the liberty to the assessee to approach the Tribunal again in case the assessee’s application under Direct
Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 is not finally accepted by the Department.
4. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open Court on 23/01/2025. [SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA]
JUDICIAL MEMBER
DATED:23/01/2025
JJ: