SMT. NISHA SAHAI,LUCKNOW vs. ITO RANGE-1(5), LUCKNOW

PDF
ITA 245/LKW/2024[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow28 January 20252 pages

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SMC BENCH, LUCKNOW

Before: SHRI. SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVAAssessment Year: 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri Shubham Rastogi, C.A.
For Respondent: Shri Sanjeev Krishna Sharma, D.R.

This appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order dated 28.02.2024, passed by the National Faceless
Appeal Centre, Delhi (NFAC) for Assessment Year 2010-11. 2. At the outset, the Ld. Authorized Representative for the assessee (Ld. A.R.) submitted that the assessee has opted for Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 (DTVSV, 2024) and copy of Form No.1 filed before the Income Tax Department, vide acknowledgement No.717444240191124 dated 19.11.2024 and copy of Form No.4 i.e. order for full and final settlement of tax arrear under sub-section (2) of section 92 read with section 93 of Finance (No.2) Act, 2024 issued by the Principal CIT, Ghaziabad

ITA No.245/LKW/2024 Page 2 of 2

(designated Authority) have also been enclosed. The prayer of the Ld. A.R. was that in view of the above, the assessee may be permitted to withdraw the appeal.
3. In view of the prayer made by the Ld. A.R., I permit the assessee to withdraw the appeal and the same is consigned to the records with the liberty to the assessee to approach the Tribunal again in case the assessee’s application under Direct
Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 is not finally accepted by the Department.
4. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced in the open Court on 28/01/2025. [SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA]

JUDICIAL MEMBER

DATED:28/01/2025
JJ:

SMT. NISHA SAHAI,LUCKNOW vs ITO RANGE-1(5), LUCKNOW | BharatTax