SAI VISION BEVERAGE, ,LUCKNOW vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-2(1), LUCKNOW

PDF
ITA 755/LKW/2024[2015-16]Status: HeardITAT Lucknow12 February 20252 pages

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, LUCKNOW BENCH ‘B’, LUCKNOW

Before: SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA & SHRI ANADEE NATH MISSHRA

PER ANADEE NATH MISSHRA:A.M.

(A)
This appeal vide I.T.A. No.755/Lkw/2024 has been filed by the assessee for assessment year 2015-16 against impugned appellate order dated
10/12/2024
(DIN
&
Order
No.ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024-
25/1071067575(1) of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [“CIT(A)” for short].

(B)
During the course of hearing, it was noticed that the assessee has submitted an application dated 24/01/2025 requesting the Bench that since the assessee has opted for Vivad Se Viswas Scheme-2024 “(VSVS” for short)
Appellant by Shri Raghu Nath Mishra, Advocate
Respondent by Shri Sunil Kumar Rajwanshi,
Addl. CIT (D.R.)

I.T.A. No.755/Lkw/2024
Assessment Year:2015-16
2

and designated authority has issued certificate in Form No. 1 on 09/01/2025
and Form No. 2 on 23/01/2025, the assessee may be permitted to withdraw the present appeal. Copy of Form No. 1 and Form 2 were also enclosed.
Learned D.R. expressed no objection. In view of the foregoing, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn on account of assessee opting for VSVS.

(C)
By way of abundant caution, we clarify that assessee will be at liberty to approach Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for restoration of appeal if it is found that the issues in dispute in present appeal are not settled under aforesaid VSVS.

(D)
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

(Order was pronounced in the open court on 12/02/2025) . .
(SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA) (ANADEE NATH MISSHRA)
Judicial Member Accountant Member

Dated:12/02/2025
*Singh

Copy of the order forwarded to :

1.

The Appellant 2. The Respondent. 3. Concerned CIT 4. D.R., I.T.A.T., 5. CIT(A)

SAI VISION BEVERAGE, ,LUCKNOW vs INCOME TAX OFFICER-2(1), LUCKNOW | BharatTax