RATAN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT LIMITED,KANPUR vs DCIT,CIRCLE 2(1)(1),, KANPUR

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, LUCKNOW BENCH “B”, LUCKNOW

Before: SHRI. SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA & SHRI ANADEE NATH MISSHRAAssessment Year: 2019-20

For Appellant: Shri A. P. Sinha, Advocate (Proxy of Shri Pradeep Kapoor, C.A.)

For Respondent: Shri Sunil Kumar Rajwanshi, D.R.

PER SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, J.M.:

This appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order dated 24.08.2022, passed by the National Faceless
Appeal Centre, Delhi (NFAC) for Assessment Year 2019-20. 2. At the outset, Shri A. P. Sinha, Advocate, proxy of the Ld. Authorized Representative for the assessee (Ld. A.R.), Shri
Pradeep Kapoor, C.A., invited our attention to the application dated 24.02.2025 of Shri Pradeep Kapoor, which was received by the Registry of this Office on 28.02.2025, stating therein that the assessee has opted for Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme,

ITA No.165/LKW/2022 Page 2 of 2

2024 (DTVSVS, 2024) and Form No.2 under DTVSVS, 2024 has been enclosed therewith. The prayer of the Ld. A.R. was that in view of the above, he may be permitted to withdraw the appeal.
3. The Ld. CIT(D.R.) has no objection.
4. In view of the prayer made by the Ld. A.R., we permit to withdraw the appeal and the same is consigned to the records with the liberty to the assessee to approach the Tribunal again in case the assessee’s application under Direct Tax Vivad Se
Vishwas Scheme, 2024 is not finally accepted by the Department.
5. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced in the open Court on 24/03/2025. [ANADEE NATH MISSHRA]
[SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA]
ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
JUDICIAL MEMBER

DATED:24/03/2025
JJ:

RATAN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT LIMITED,KANPUR vs. DCIT,CIRCLE 2(1)(1),, KANPUR