MOHAN KUMAR ,LUCKNOW vs. ITO WARD-2(5), LUCKNOW-NEW
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, LUCKNOW BENCH ‘A’, LUCKNOW
Before: SHRI ANADEE NATH MISSHRA & SHRI SUBHASH MALGURIA
PER SUBHASH MALGURIA:J.M.
This appeal vide I.T.A. No.222/Lkw/2024 has been filed by the assessee for assessment year 2017-18 against impugned appellate order dated
06/02/2024
(DIN
&
Order
No.ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023-
24/1060559101(1) of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [“CIT(A)”] for short].
Appellant by Shri P. K. Kapoor, C. A.
Respondent by Shri Amit Kumar, D.R.
I.T.A. No. 222/Lkw/2024
During the course of hearing, it was noticed that the assessee has submitted an application dated 10/05/2025 vide which it has been requested that since the assessee has opted for Vivad Se Viswas Scheme- 2024 “(VSVS” for short) and the designated authority has issued certificate in Form No. 2 on 02/05/2025, the assessee may be permitted to withdraw the present appeal. Copy of Form 2 was also enclosed. Learned D.R. expressed no objection. In view of the foregoing, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn on account of assessee opting for VSVS.
By way of abundant caution, we clarify that assessee will be at liberty to approach Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for restoration of appeal if it is found that the issue in dispute in present appeal is not settled under aforesaid VSVS.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Order pronounced in the open court on 23/05/2025) . .
(ANADEE NATH MISSHRA) (SUBHASH MALGURIA)
Accountant Member
Judicial Member
Dated:23/05/2025
*Singh
Copy of the order forwarded to :
1. The Appellant
2. The Respondent
3. Concerned CIT
4. The CIT(A)
5. D.R. ITAT, Lucknow