LALBAGH CHRISTIAN EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,LUCKNOW vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the delay in filing Form No. 10B had been condoned by the Ld. CIT(E). Therefore, the appeal became infructuous and was dismissed.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was dismissed by the CIT(A) for delay in filing Form No. 10B. The assessee argued that the delay was condonable and a petition for condonation was pending.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal is infructuous if the delay in filing Form No. 10B is subsequently condoned by the higher authority.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, LUCKNOW BENCH “A”, LUCKNOW
Before: SHRI KUL BHARAT & SHRI NIKHIL CHOUDHARY
PER KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT.:
This appeal, by the assessee is directed against the order of the Learned Addl. Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemptions), Panaji dated 09.01.2025. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal: -
1. Because the CIT (A) has erred on facts and in law in dismissing the appeal of the assessee overlooking the issue of condonation of delay caused in filing Form No. 10B, such delay being condonable as per section 119(2)(b), petition for which is pending adjudication before the CIT(Exemptions), the order passed by the CIT(A) be set aside.
2. Because the CIT(A) has failed to appreciate that the delay in filing Form No. 10B was purely on account of the delay caused on account of the person preparing and filing of the Audit report / returns, the assessee being under a bonafide belief that the same would be done in time, was not justified in not appreciating the facts and circumstances of the case and dismissing the appeal in limine.
3. Because the CIT(A) has failed to appreciate that in the case of sister organization, namely, Lalbagh Methodist Church where the facts and circumstances being the same, the CIT(A) having allowed the appeal, copy of which order was filed in the submissions, should have considered the same and not have dismissed the appeal, in any case the order Passed by the CIT(A) is bad in law be set aside.
Page 2 of 3 4. Because without prejudice to the above grounds of appeal even if the Form No.10B, is deemed to have not been filed, yet the computation of income ought to be done as per the penal provisions wherein, the expenditure incurred in earning the income be deducted, as against levying tax on the entire gross receipts, the order is erroneous be set aside.”
2. In this case, the assessee has taken multiple grounds stating that the delay in filing Form No.10B is a condonable delay. In short, the prayer of the assessee is for setting aside the impugned order for re-consideration of the matter as the application seeking condonation of delay is pending before the Ld. CIT(E).
Ld. Counsel for the assessee, at the outset, contended that the Ld. CIT(E), Lucknow, vide its communication dated 24.02.2025 has condoned the delay in filing Form No.10B for the A.Y. 2022-23. Therefore, the assessee has left with no grievance now.
The Ld. Departmental Representative has conceded the factum of condonation of delay in filing Form No.10B by Ld. CIT(E).
Heard, the Ld. Representatives of the parties and perused the material available on record. Admittedly, the delay in filing Form No.10B has been condoned by the Ld. CIT(E). Therefore, the present appeal has become infructuous. We hereby dismiss the same. No order to costs.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open Court on 10/07/2025.
More judgments on Section 119(2)(b)
- Jijamata Mahila Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari… vs ITO Ward -1, BhandraITA 102/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Pushpa Chandra Raj Singhvi Charitable… vs CIT(Exemption), Income Tax Appellate TribunaITA 8820/MUM/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Pratik Deepak Agarwal, Lonavla vs Assessing Officer, Ward 9(3), Akurdi, PuneITA 2227/PUN/2026[2025-2026]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2025-2026
- Pushpa Bitan Friendship Society, Kolkata vs I.T.O., Ward - 1(4), Exemption, KolkataITA 2607/KOL/2026[2018-2019]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2018-2019
- Tiong Woon Project & Contracting Pte Ltd… vs ACIT, Intl. Taxn. Circle-2(2), ChennaiITA 1883/CHNY/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. V J Petro Products vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St) - IiiAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026