DAYAL EDUCATIONAL WELFARE SOCIETY,KANNAUJ vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal observed that the CIT (Exemptions) rejected the application without providing the assessee a reasonable opportunity to present the required details. Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the CIT (Exemptions)'s order and remanded the matter back for a fresh decision after providing the assessee a reasonable opportunity of being heard.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Dayal Educational Welfare Society, applied for registration under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The CIT (Exemptions) rejected the application because the assessee failed to provide sufficient documentary evidence of its charitable activities, despite a notice being issued to furnish details, to which only a partial reply was submitted.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT (Exemptions) was justified in rejecting the assessee's application for registration under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act without providing a reasonable opportunity to the assessee to furnish evidence of its charitable activities.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 12AA,Section 12AB(1)(ii)(B)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, LUCKNOW BENCH ‘B’, LUCKNOW
Before: SHRI SUBHASH MALGURIA & SHRI NIKHIL CHOUDHARY
has been filed by the assessee against the impugned order dated 28/10/2024 (DIN & Notice No.ITBA/EXM/F/EXM45/2024-25/1069983967(1) of CIT (Exemptions) passed under section 12AB(1)(ii)(B) of the Income Tax Act.
The facts of the case, in brief, are that an application for registration of the trust u/s 12AA of the I.T. Act was filed by the assessee on 03/04/2024 in Form No.10AB under Rule 17A of the I.T. Rules 1962. The learned CIT (Exemptions) issued a notice on 14/08/2024 to the assessee to submit a note on activities conducted since inception/during last three years and a note specifying the main area of charitable/religious activities and a projection/plan for the main Assessment Year:N.A. 2 charitable/religious activities to be undertaken in the next two years. In response to the said notice, the assessee filed part reply which was not accepted by the learned CIT (Exemptions). The learned CIT (Exemptions) rejected the application of the assessee for registration u/s 12AA of the Act on the ground that the assessee has failed to file documentary evidences to enable him to satisfy himself about the genuineness & commencement of its charitable activities. Aggrieved, the assessee is in appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.
At the time of hearing before us, there was no representation from the assessee’s side. Learned CIT (D.R.) was heard and the materials available on record were perused. We noted from the order of learned CIT (Exemptions) that the learned CIT (Exemptions) rejected the assessee’s application u/s 12AA of the Act without providing reasonable opportunity for providing the details called for by the learned CIT (Exemptions) and therefore, the matter should go back to him for a fresh decision. Learned CIT (D.R.) supported the order of learned CIT Exemptions, Lucknow. In view of the foregoing and in the specific facts and circumstances of the present appeals before us; we set aside the impugned order of learned CIT (Exemptions) and restore the matter regarding the assessee’s applications u/s 12AA of the Act; back to his file with the direction to consider the application of the assessee for registration u/s 12AA of the Act afresh, and to pass de novo order after giving reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
(Order pronounced in the open court on 23/07/2025)
More judgments on Section 12AA
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Sri Jawahar Education Trust, Chamarajanagar vs The Income Tax Officer Ward 1…ITA 1735/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026