M/s. Egon Zehnder International Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi -IV

ITA-614/2009HC Delhi2009:DHC:567023 December 20092 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the High Court hold?

The Tribunal upheld the CIT's assumption of jurisdiction under Section 263 and the disallowance of expenses related to the non-resident holding company's costs. The existence of a PE in India was also affirmed.

What were the facts?

The appeals concern the existence of a Permanent Establishment (PE) of a non-resident company in India and the disallowance of expenses claimed by the assessee. The CIT had assumed jurisdiction under Section 263, and the Tribunal upheld this action.

What were the issues?

Key issues include the correctness of the Tribunal upholding the CIT's jurisdiction under Section 263, the existence of a PE in India, and the validity of disallowing expenses under Section 40(a)(i).

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 263,Section 40(a)(i),Section 195(2)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

ITA No. 601 of 2009 ITA No. 602 of 2009 ITA No. 614 of 2009

%

Reserved on: December 04, 2009 Pronounced on: December 23, 2009

M/s. Egon Zehnder International Pvt. Ltd.

. . . Appellant

through : Dr. Rakesh Gupta with

Ms. Poonam Ahuja and

Ms. Mahima Agrawal, Advocates

VERSUS

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi -IV

. . . Respondent

through : Mr. N.P. Sahni with

Mr. P.C. Yadav and

Ms. Sonia Mathur, Advocates

CORAM :-

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL

1.

Whether Reporters of Local newspapers may be allowed to see the Judgment?

2.

To be referred to the Reporter or not?

3.

Whether the Judgment should be reported in the Digest?

A.K. SIKRI, J.

1.

Admit.

2.

Following substantial questions of law arise for determination :- “ITA No. 601/2009

1) Whether the Tribunal is correct in law and on facts in upholding the act of the CIT in assuming juri iction and issuing notice under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961?

2) Whether the order of the Tribunal is perverse in assuming/h

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 263

All 13,616 judgments and leading authorities on Section 263 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →