INCOME TAX OFFICER, DELHI vs. GOVERDHAN TRANSPORT COMPANY PVT. LTD., DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s order, finding that shares were duly allotted and many shareholders were existing ones. Relying on precedents like Lovely Exports, the Tribunal stated that the Revenue could proceed against individual shareholders if their identities were disclosed, finding no infirmity in the lower appellate authority's decision.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed the CIT(A)'s order which partly allowed the assessee's appeal against an addition of Rs. 6.66 crores under Section 68 for unexplained share capital. The CIT(A) sustained an addition of Rs. 30.42 lacs.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in deleting additions related to share capital under Section 68, and whether the source of investors was sufficiently examined.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘B, NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN & SHRI SUDHIR KUMAR
PER SUDHIR KUMAR, JM : This appeal is preferred by the Revenue against the order of National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi dated 12.2.2024 for AY 2014-15. Assessment in this case was framed by the DCIT, Circle 10(1), New Delhi for the assessment year 2014-15 u/s.143(3) of the Act. The Revenue has raised the following grounds:-
Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the ld. CIT(A) has erred in allowing relief to the assessee in deleting the addition of Rs.6,35,58,000/- u/s.68 of the Act being unexplained credits in the books of accounts of the assessee in the guise of s
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 68
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Bliss Dealtrade Private Limited, Kolkata vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 9(2) Kolkata…ITA 208/KOL/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-13
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jharkhand Contractors Association Thro Its President- Pramod Kumar vs. Bharat Coking Coal LTD. Thro Its Chairman Cum Managing DirectorJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Isc Processors Private Limited vs. Superintendent,Range-Iv, Burrabazar Div, CGST And Cx, Kolkata (N) Commissionerate And AnrCalcutta · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Raashi Constructions vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Bidasaria Fenster Solutions vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 13 Oct 2026
- Amit Agency vs. Commissioner, CGST And CxPatna · 13 Oct 2026