MRIDUL JAIN HUF,KANPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(3)(1), KANPUR, AAYAKAR BHAWAN
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SMC BENCH, LUCKNOW
Before: SHRI. SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVAAssessment Year: 2013-14
This appeal has been preferred by the assessee against order, dated 17.10.2023, passed by the National Faceless Appeal
Centre, Delhi (NFAC) for Assessment Year 2013-14. 2.0
During the course of hearing, the Ld. Authorized
Representative for the assessee (Ld. A.R.) invited my attention to assessee’s application dated Nil, received by the Registry of this Office on 27.01.2025, vide which it has been submitted that the assessee has opted for Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme,
2024 (DTVSV, 2024). The Ld. A.R. furnished a copy of Form
No.2 [Certificate under sub-section (1) of section 92 of the Finance (No.2) Act, 2024 (under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas
Scheme, 2024)] issued by the Ld. Principal Commissioner of ITA No.401/LKW/2023 Page 2 of 2
Income
Tax,
Kanpur
(designated authority), vide dated
08.01.2025. The prayer of the Ld. A.R. was that in view of the above, assessee may be permitted to withdraw the appeal.
3.0
In view of the prayer made by the Ld. A.R., I permit the assessee to withdraw the appeal and the same is consigned to record with the liberty to the assessee to approach the Tribunal again in case the assessee’s application under Direct Tax Vivad
Se Vishwas Scheme is not finally accepted by the Department.
4.0
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open Court on 25/08/2025. [SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA]
JUDICIAL MEMBER
DATED:25/08/2025
JJ: