VIKAS SINGH,SHAHJAHANPUR vs. ASSESSMENT UNIT, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) passed a cryptic and non-speaking order, failing to provide a reasonable opportunity to the assessee. The additions made by the Assessing Officer were restored back to the Assessing Officer for a de novo assessment.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed a return of income for AY 2021-22. The Assessing Officer made additions of Rs. 2,34,29,987/-. The CIT(A) dismissed the assessee's appeal on limitation grounds without going into the merits.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal on limitation without considering the merits? Whether the AO provided a reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee during assessment?
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, LUCKNOW BENCH ‘B’, LUCKNOW
Before: SHRI ANADEE NATH MISSHRA & SHRI SUBHASH MALGURIA
2021-22 against impugned appellate order dated 26/12/2024 (DIN & Order No.ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024- 25/1071587981(1) of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [“CIT(A)” for short].
(B) The facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee filed his return of income for the year under consideration on 31/03/2022 showing income of Rs.6,58,330/-. The Assessing Officer completed the assessment and passed assessment order on 27/12/2022 under section 144 read with section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act” for short) and determined the total income of the assessee at Rs.2,40,88,317/- by making addition of Rs.2,34,29,987/- on account of variation in respect of issue of purchases made under section 69C of the Act. Being aggrieved, the assessee filed appeal in the office of learned CIT(A). Vide impugned order dated 26/12/2024, the assessee’s appeal was dismissed by the learned CIT(A) on limitation ground, without going into merits of the appeal (C) During the course of hearing in Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, none was present on behalf of assessee. In absence of any representation from assessee’s side, learned Departmental Representative was heard and materials on record were perused. From perusal of records, it is found that learned CIT(A) did not accept the assessee’s application for condonation of delay; but has not discussed the assessee’s case in detail. Moreover, the learned CIT(A) has passed a cryptic, vague and non-speaking order, without explaining the facts and circumstances of the case and without supporting his decision with adequate reasons or convincing materials. There are signs of non-application of mind and dismissal of the assessee’s appeal in limine, in a summary manner, unreasonably. Therefore, we are unable to uphold the decision of learned CIT(A) in referring to condone the delay in filing of appeal in the office of CIT(A). The Assessing Officer has not provided reasonable opportunity to the assessee before finalising the assessment. In view of the foregoing regarding additions made in the assessment order, the issues in dispute are restored back to the file of the Assessing Officer with the direction to pass de novo order in accordance with law after providing reasonable opportunity to the assessee.
(D) In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes.
(Order pronounced in the open court on 17/10/2025)
More judgments on Section 144B
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Mohammed Javed Bhati, Sikar vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, SikarITA 994/JPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Haresh Sharma, Ahmedabad vs ITO, Ward 5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2125/AHD/2026[2019-2020]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-2020
- Haresh Sharma, Ahmedabad vs ITO, Ward 5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2124/AHD/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Saraswati Phukan vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026