SIR SYED EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,BADAUN vs. CIT EXEMPTION, LUCKNOW,
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the appeals were dismissed as they were barred by limitation. However, the assessee was given liberty to approach the Tribunal for restoration if the defect causing the delay was rectified.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed two appeals for assessment years 2024-25 against separate impugned orders. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's Registry communicated that the appeals were time-barred, and no application for condonation of delay was submitted.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeals filed by the assessee are time-barred, and if so, whether they should be dismissed.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, LUCKNOW BENCH ‘A’, LUCKNOW
Before: SHRI KUL BHARAT & SHRI ANADEE NATH MISSHRA
(Order pronounced in the open court on 28/11/2024)
Sd/. Sd/. (KUL BHARAT) (ANADEE NATH MISSHRA) Vice President Accountant Member Dated:28/11/2024 *Singh Copy of the order forwarded to :
1. 1. The Appellant 2. The Respondent.
3. Concerned CIT 4. D.R., I.T.A.T.,
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Kavya Shrivastava vs. Hdfc Bank LTD.Madhya Pradesh · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Gaurav Jewellers Through Proprietor Gaurav Barjatiya vs. Branch Manager Yes Bank LTD.Madhya Pradesh · 15 Oct 2026
- Kavya Shrivastava vs. State Bank Of INDIAMadhya Pradesh · 15 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026