GURMIT KAUR,CHANDIGARH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1(3), CHANDIGARH
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal held that the CIT(A) passed an ex-parte order without providing adequate opportunity. The matter was remitted back to the CIT(A) for a fresh decision after providing a reasonable opportunity.
What were the facts?
The assessment was completed under section 143(3) r.w.s 147 bringing to tax Rs 74,00,000 under section 68 for unexplained deposits. The CIT(A) sustained the order due to non-prosecution by the assessee.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) passed an ex-parte order without giving adequate opportunity to the assessee. Whether the matter should be remanded for a fresh hearing.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Order PER VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, A.M. : This is an appeal filed by the Assessee against the order of the Ld. CIT(A)/ NFAC, Delhi dt. 11/12/2023 pertaining to Assessment Year 2012-13.
Briefly the facts of the case are that the assessment was completed under section 143(3) r.w.s 147 of the Act vide order dt. 18/11/2016 wherein the AO brought to tax a sum of Rs 74,00,000 u/s 68 as unexplained deposits found credited in the bank account of the assessee and assessed income was determined at Rs. 75,36,420/-. Against the order of the AO, the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) who has since sustained the said order on account of non-prosecution on behalf of the assessee.
Being aggrieved, the assessee is in appeal before us. During the course of hearing, the Ld. AR submitted that the Ld. CIT(A) has passed an ex-parte order without providing adequate opportunity to the assessee. It was submitted that the notices have been uploaded on the e-filing portal but the same have not been served on the email- id of the assessee as provided in Form 35 nor any physical notices have been served. It was submitted that assessee be allowed one last opportunity and the matter may be remitted to the file of the Ld. CIT(A) to decide the same afresh and it was submitted that the assessee shall attend to the proceedings before the Ld. CIT(A) and file the necessary information/documentation.
Per contra, the Ld. DR relied on the order of the lower authorities. 5. After hearing both the parties and perusing the material available on the record, we find that the assessee deserves one last opportunity and cannot be condemned unheard and therefore, keeping in view principles of substantial justice, the matter is remitted to the file of the Ld. CIT(A) to decide the same afresh after providing reasonable opportunity to the assessee.
In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Shadab Malik vs. State Of U.P. And 2 OthersAllahabad · 26 Oct 2026
- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vajram Infra Material Industries vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026