DESH MITTER GAIND,PANCHKULA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, PANCHKULA, PANCHKULA, HARYANA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the proviso to Section 50C, which allows consideration based on the agreement date, was introduced prospectively from 01.04.2017. Therefore, it could not be applied retrospectively to the assessee's case, and the AO's addition was upheld.
What were the facts?
The assessee sold an immovable property for Rs. 2,42,00,000, but the stamp duty valuation was Rs. 3,16,20,230. The Assessing Officer (AO) invoked Section 50C, treating the difference as capital gains. The assessee argued that an agreement to sell was made earlier when the stamp duty rate was lower.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the amended provisions of Section 50C, allowing consideration based on the agreement date, could be applied retrospectively to a transaction prior to its amendment.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 50C,Section 48,Section 253,Section 250,Section 148,Section 143(3),Section 147,Section 246A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Alom Extrusions Ltd.1,344 citing319 ITR 306 · 2009 · SC · Read judgment
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CHANDIGARH
Before: SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV & SHRI PARESH M. JOSHI,
In the premises we set aside the impugned order and allow the appeal of the assessee.
In result appeal of assessee is allowed.
Order pronounced on 29.01.2025.
More judgments on Section 50C
- M N S Barium Salts, Kadapa vs ITO, Ward-1, KadapaITA 2412/HYD/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Sawalchand Chunilal Bafna HUF, Mumbai vs Income Tax Officer-16(1)(1), MumbaiITA 7492/MUM/2025[2011-12]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2011-12
- Jagdishbhai Vasharambhai Italiya, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-3(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 150/AHD/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Rohini Ramhari Bhadale, Pune vs Assessing Officer Ward 2(2) Pune, PuneITA 2767/PUN/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Sweta Somani, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 44(2), KolkataITA 1656/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetanj Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Namita Behera vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Ratul Boro vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Jashwant Sharma vs. The Union Of INDIA And A4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026