TINY TULIPS FOUNDATION,PUNJAB vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal, while noting the rejection due to non-compliance with furnishing details, decided to grant the assessee another opportunity to present its case, keeping in mind the principle of natural justice.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed applications for registration under Section 12AA and Section 80G of the Income Tax Act. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) rejected these applications, citing the assessee's failure to provide requisite details.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee should be granted a further opportunity to furnish details for registration under Sections 12AA and 80G after rejection by the CIT(E).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, CHANDIGARH
Before: HON’BLE SHRI RAJPAL YADAV & HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM
O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member) 1. Aggrieved by rejection of applications seeking registration u/s 12AA as well as u/s 80G vide impugned orders passed by learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh [CIT(E)] on 15-11-2013 & 17-11-2023, the assessee is in further appeal before us.
Upon perusal of paras 4.1 and 5 of impugned order dated 15-11- 2023, it could be seen that the registration has been denied since the assessee failed to file the requisite details as called for by registration authority. Consequently, the registration u/s 80G was also denied.
Aggrieved, the assessee is in further appeal before us. The Director of the assessee-entity appeared in person and stated that the assessee is in a position to substantiate its activities. He also prayed for another opportunity of hearing to substantiate its case.
Keeping in mind the principle of natural justice, we deem it fit to grant another opportunity of hearing to the assessee. Accordingly, the impugned orders are set aside and the matter of registrations u/s 12AA as well as u/s 80G stand restored back to the file of Ld. CIT(E) for fresh consideration with a direction to the assessee to plead and prove its applications.
Both the appeals stand allowed for statistical purposes. . Orders pronounced on 24-03-2025.
More judgments on Section 12AA
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Sri Jawahar Education Trust, Chamarajanagar vs The Income Tax Officer Ward 1…ITA 1735/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026
- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026