← Back to search

THE BARNALA PRIMARY COOPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK LIMITED,BARNALA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, BARNALA

PDF
ITA 983/CHANDI/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh21 April 20253 pages

1

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
‘B’ BENCH, CHANDIGARH

BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, VICE PRESIDENT
AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM

आयकरअपीलसं./ ITA No.983/CHANDI/2024
(िनधाŊरणवषŊ / Assessment Year: 2020-21)
The Barnala Primary Cooperative
Agricultural Development Bank Ltd.
Dhanaula Road opp. PSPCL Office,
Barnala.148001. बनाम/ Vs.
ITO
Barnala 148101. ̾थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No. AAAAT-4569-L
(अपीलाथŎ/Appellant)
:
(ŮȑथŎ / Respondent)

अपीलाथŎकीओरसे/ Appellant by : Sh. Deepak Aggarwal(Adv.) – Ld. AR
ŮȑथŎकीओरसे/Respondent by :
Smt. Kusum Bansal (CIT) – Ld. DR

सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date of Hearing
:
02-04-2025
घोषणाकीतारीख /Date of Pronouncement
:
21-04-2025

आदेश / O R D E R

Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member)

1.

Aforesaid appeal by assessee for Assessment Year (AY) 2020-21 arises out of an order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [CIT(A)] dated 05-08-2024 in the matter of an assessment framed by Ld. Assessing Officer [AO] u/s. 143(3) of the Act on 21-09-2022. The sole grievance of the assessee is rejection of claim u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) for Rs.168.23 Lacs. Having heard rival submissions and upon perusal of case records, the appeal is disposed-off as under.

2.

The impugned deduction has been denied by Ld. AO on the ground that the assessee was a co-operative bank and not a cooperative society though the assessee claimed that it was co- operative society engaged in the business of banking or providing credit facilities to its members. The Ld. AO also held that the assessee has income from other sources from Rs.132.36 Lacs in the shape of interest on deposits from bank, commission income, dividend income and interest on investment. Finally, the deduction of Rs.168.23 Lacs as claimed by the assessee u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) was denied to the assessee. The Ld. CIT(A) confirmed the assessment for want of any response from the assessee. Aggrieved, the assessee is in further appeal before us. 3. From case records, it emerges that the assessee is constituted as a cooperative society and it is providing credit facilities to its members as per guidelines framed by its parent body SADB and NABARD. As per the provisions of Sec.80P(2)(a)(i) any co-operative society which is engaged in carrying on the business of banking or providing credit facilities to its members, the whole of the amount of profits and gains of business attributable to such an activity would be eligiblefor deduction. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Kerala State Co-operative Agricultural and Rural Development Bank Ltd. (CA Nos.10069 of 2016 dated 14-09-2023)held that if a co-operative society does not transact the business of banking as defined in clause (b) of Section 5 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, it would not be a cooperative bank. In fact, similar deduction as claimed by the assessee has been granted by Ld. AO in scrutiny assessment proceedings for AY 2023-24 vide assessment order u/s 143(3) dated 21-12-2024, a copy of which has been placed on record.On these facts, we direct Ld. AO to allow impugned deduction to the assessee. 4. The appeal stand allowed in terms of our above order.

Order pronounced on 21-04-2025. ( RAJPAL YADAV)
लेखासद˟ /ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

Dated: 21-04-2025. आदेश की Ůितिलिप अŤेिषत /Copy of the Order forwarded to :
1. अपीलाथŎ/Appellant
2. ŮȑथŎ/Respondent
3. आयकरआयुƅ/CIT
4. िवभागीयŮितिनिध/DR
5. गाडŊफाईल/GF

THE BARNALA PRIMARY COOPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK LIMITED,BARNALA vs INCOME TAX OFFICER, BARNALA | BharatTax