M/S STARPOINT DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O.,WARD-14(4), KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the ex-parte order of the CIT(A) and restored the matter back to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication. The assessee was directed to produce directors and participate in the inquiry to prove the genuineness of share subscribers.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal before the CIT(A) was decided ex-parte due to non-compliance by the assessee despite multiple opportunities. The AO had made an addition under Section 68 for share capital and premium amounting to Rs. 11.08 crores.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) order passed ex-parte was justified, and if the matter should be remanded for fresh adjudication with directions for further inquiry.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH: KOLKATA
Before: Shri P. M. Jagtap(KZ) & Shri A. T. Varkey]
ORDER
Per Shri A. T. Varkey, JM:
1. This is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of the Ld. CIT(A)-5, Kolkata dated 08.08.2019 for AY 2012-13 .
2. At the outset, the Ld. AR of the assessee Shri Bisweswar Ghosh, Advocate drew our attention to the fact that the Ld. CIT(A) has passed an ex-parte order. Though the Ld. AR vehemently pleaded that the matter may be restored back to the AO and has given undertaking that they will produce directors of the share applicant companies as well as that of assessee company before the AO. However, we note that before the Ld. CIT(A) there was no compliance despite the Ld. CIT(A) giving eight opportunities by fixing the appeal of hearing. Only once the Ld. A.R of the assessee appeared before the Ld. CIT(A) [on or before 13.01.2017] for seeking adjournment and thereafter the Ld. A.R. did not appear before the Ld. CIT(A) on 07.03.2017 or thereafter. We further note that the appeal was fixed before the Ld. CIT(A) on eight occasions from 07.11.2016 to 08.08.2019 i.e. approx three (3) years and the assessee did not care to appear before the Ld. CIT(A) which action of assessee cannot be countenenced. And the averment of the assessee that it got only one opportunity before the AO is belied by the fact recorded by M/s Star Point Developer Pvt. Ltd., AY 2012-13 the AO that pursuant to the notice issued by him, the assessee’s A.R. Shri K. V. Jaiswal appeared from time to time and has filed details and documents to substantiate the issue of share capital and premium to the tune of Rs. 11.08 crores. However after cross- verification of the facts borne out of the documents submitted by the assessee, the AO has recorded his dissatisfaction of the nature and source of the credit entry to the tune of Rs. 11.08 crores and made addition u/s 68 of the Act. Since it is an ex-parte order of the Ld CIT(A), we are inclined to set aside the order of the Ld. CIT(A) and restore the matter back to the file of the Ld. CIT(A) with a direction that the Ld. CIT(A) to adjudicate the grounds raised by the assessee after calling for remand report from the AO. In the remand proceedings before the AO, the assessee is directed to produce the directors of the share subscriber companies as well as the assessee company and to participate in the enquiry/investigation to prove the identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of the share subscribers to the tune of Rs. 11.08 cr., as undertaken in the affidavit. And thereafter the AO to carry out the investigation/verification to examine the nature and source of the credit entry to the tune of Rs. 11.08 cr. and then to submit the remand report before the Ld. CIT(A) and thereafter the Ld. CIT(A) to decide the appeal of the assessee in accordance to law and as per the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court and jurisdictional High Court on the subject.
In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order is pronounced in the open court on 30th September, 2021.
Sd/- Sd/- (P. M. Jagtap) (A. T. Varkey) Vice President Judicial Member Dated: 30th September, 2021 JD, Sr. PS
M/s Star Point Developer Pvt. Ltd., AY 2012-13 Copy of the order forwarded to:
Appellant- M/s. Star Point Developer Pvt. Ltd., Diamond Heritage, 16, Strand Road, Room No. H-523A, 5th floor, Kolkata-700 001.
Respondent – ITO, Ward-14(4), Kolkata.
More judgments on Section 68
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Bliss Dealtrade Private Limited, Kolkata vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 9(2) Kolkata…ITA 208/KOL/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-13
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- J.M.Swamy vs. Government Of INDIAKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Acc LTD. vs. Secy.Industries Deptt.Orissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Kumaran Transports (Tuticorin) Private Limited vs. The Assistant Commissioner Madras · 16 Oct 2026